The first two statements seem outrageous and yet the third we hear every day. The evolutionists shamelessly discredit the Intelligent Design movement with such statements. It is prejudice and discrimination of the most primitive order. Scientific statements are to be ignored when spoken by a Bible believer unless they support evolution.

And what is the basis of this ignorant behavior? The “scientists” know people’s motives. Not scientifically of course, they just KNOW. They “know” that these people are up to something. They “know” that these people are trying to sneak religion back in. They “know” that people of faith cannot possibly make any accurate scientific statements.

Since when in America are certain religious, ethnic or age groups silenced because of their association category?

I pay taxes. I vote. I read. I think. I have opinions. Yet my well researched scientific ideas are to be ignored because of my religious persuasion? 

Recently I heard the comment that President Bush has no place suggesting what students should be taught and that he should leave this to the School Boards.

I also read that in Kansas, when the evolutionists boycotted their invitation to present their side of scientific evidence that the sole representative, Pedro Irigonegaray, a Topeka lawyer, represented pro-evolution scientists. He chastised the School Board. There he was accusing them as being unqualified to determine what is scientific because that was the job of scientists, not a state school board.

At the same hearings in Kansas, there were scientists who testified on behalf of Intelligent Design and their scientific problems with evolution. The pro-evolution scientists who boycotted the meeting but daily watched and made their criticisms to the press every day said about those pro-Intelligent Design scientists “They are not real scientists”.

Apparently, no one is qualified to oppose evolution, not politicians, not school boards and not scientists. Because if you are a scientist who opposes evolution you are not a real scientist. Because as we hear all the pro-evolutionists that all seem to have the same 3X5 card on what to say, “There is no controversy”.  Me thinks thou dost protest too much.

Meanwhile, they fund the National Center for Science Education $700,000 a year not for research but for public relations and protecting the theory of evolution. According to the NCSE, the theory of evolution is being challenged in 21 states and they are monitoring those places. They brag about their network of supporters: teachers, scientists, ministers, priests and lay people. Ummm, I thought these types all had unqualified opinions?? Oh, I see. Everyone who agrees with evolution should be heard and all those opposing evolution no matter what the position is, is not qualified to have a respectable opinion.

Discrimination is indiscriminate in regards to race or religion or financial status. This discrimination is simply based on your opinion. If you want to present evidence contradicting the theory of evolution, you are a “blasphemer” and will be censored and ignored and your motives are wrong.

If you agree with the evolutionary theory for any reason at all, religious, scientific, political or no reason; you are intelligent and you opinion is important.

It is like the Inquisition but in the 21^st century. These evolutionist scientists are “bishops” silencing those having different doctrine while telling the public they are “protecting” them from heresy.

Me, on the other, prefer a debate of facts and evidence, not one about who is allowed to speak and what the majority thinks. But that would just be scientific.

            Maybe I should intersperse my nature articles in-between observations of the media tactics I see to discredit the Intelligent Design ideas before they are even understood by the public.

The side of me that contemplates the beauty of nature and its ingenuity can be viewed at www.NatureNeverStopsTalking.com