Posted in parenting
|
I hadn't meant to let a whole week slip by before blogging. It's just the having one's house spotless and immaculate that has kept me busy. LOL. Anyone who knows my gang knows how tricky that is! Yesterday we had two showings. I'll be so relieved when this is behind us and we can relax about messes again! God was so good though. I felt prompted before we left the house to have it "ready" just in case we got a request to see the house while we were gone to the city pool. So I scurried around perfecting everything real quick. When we pulled out of the driveway there was a "looker" in her car with her three kids chatting to my agent on the phone about seeing the house right away! Wow...I was so glad I'd listened to that inner prompting. It must have been the Lord. Isn't that neat? Some of you have asked me about the Pearl seminar recently. I'll share a bit here about what he said in response to my question about children visiting other friends and having peer time. My question arose from the increasing tendency for the children to want to go off to friends' houses. I've felt hesitant, wondering if much peer time is a good thing. I've heard speakers/writers assert that peer time is unnecessary, bad and only family should suffice. But we know these families. They're pretty nice folks and have pretty good kids. So I asked Mike his opinion. He first asserted that he didn't maintain that kids should be isolated from peers. He felt that it was good for them to learn to cope in social situations. They ought to learn how to work through things with others, be a friend, be in a tempting situation and even get picked on. He asserted, however, that positive relationship time with YOU (ie: the mom or dad) should be higher, more, and consequently stronger than that time with peers. This is so that in the long & short run, the parent's values are weightier than the peer's values. He also added the provision that if this social time is unsupervised, it should only be with folks in whom you have implicit trust in their spiritual grounding, etc. So in effect, social time is to be rationed, so to speak, judiciously. Not unending play-times all day every day. I liked his answer. But it is a challenge to implement. Take today, for example. After having friends over for Bible study this morning, the children began requesting friend time at lunch. I said no. "I haven't had time with you yet today! Let's do something together!" This wasn't met with cheers. But, at least they didn't groan. "Well, can we play Seafarers of Catan?" my ten year old replied eagerly. "You bet!" I said. (Even though I know this game will last all of precious nap time and require my utmost in diplomacy for arbitrating conflict between two competetive boys! And I would have loved to curl up on my bed with a book.) The game was fun. And it was competetive. I had to put out fires of frustration and quell dogging of the opponents. There were some good character tips in our debrief of the three way tie (wink wink--I really won..) This was just how I put into practice his advice. It makes sense. Parents who let peers (especially unhealthy peers) have the bulk of their children's time, wonder what happened when they lose their children's hearts. I don't want to be in that boat down the road. The trouble is that it takes OUR time to be unselfish. To give our own time. To play the games, take them out to work with us, to homeschool, to get in the pool and splash...not just be a sideline parent. It's hard (for me) not to be lazy. Here's to putting your heart into it! |
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
">




