|
Aug. 7, 2006
Education and the Industrial Model
I've been reading The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul (he's taken a back seat to books I'm reading in preparation for school right now). There were some connections I made between that book and things said at the CiRCE conference. Although I didn't want to give away the conference with people like Cindy doing such an admirable job of telling about the workshops, I was so struck at the timeliness of one of the themes of the conference. Education was likened to cultivation rather than production. We have such a production-oriented mentality because of the assumptions we have which have been molded by the Industrial Society. Although I'm not sure I'd want to be a true agrarian and go back to the land and do everything ourselves, I do want to make sure I'm not letting my mind be controlled by industrial models in education. Ellul demonstrates how technology has reached it tentacles into every area of life. One example is the production of the car. Once the car was built and was made more efficient, the demand arose to make roads better because the efficiency of the car was wasted and limited by the poor roads. The roads are then made better, but had to be paid for by taxes which required legislation. So we have technology affecting commerce, economics, and politics. In other books, I've read how business came to be so influential in education and how modern educational philosophies reflect business ideals. The CiRCE conference juxtaposed an agrarian model to the industrial model. An industrial model is concerned with the most product for the least money: efficiency. It's concerned with uniformity, not craftmanship. We should never view life that way. We're dealing with living people, not objects to be manipulated.
I was thinking about this this last weekend in looking over what I accomplished last week. I felt that I hadn't gotten much done. I had looked back over the many things that seemed to interrupt my purposes and realized that all those things were important. They were the interruptions of life and involved relationships with other people. SAHMs can particularly have difficulty seeing the importance of what they do because they don't bring home a paycheck or do something in the world that's deemed important by our society. But where does that mindset come from? I believe it comes from buying into the lie of the industrial model into all of life.
I was touched by something one of my sons told me last week. He has stumbled across a blog where the woman was staying at home with children, but she felt that she wasn't doing anything really important *out* in the wide world. He posted that he thought she should never think that what she was doing was not important and not impacting society. Then he said that he felt that his own mom (me!) had a great impact by being home with him and his siblings. It's sort of like the pebble dropped into the pond. There are repercussions beyond which we will ever know. But I think that if we think about what kind of important role we're playing in our children's lives as something we're crafting or cultivating and not something that we're trying to do with the greatest amount of efficiency with the greatest amount of end product, the more satisified and content we'll be in the lives we live.
|
| •
Post A Comment! •
Send to a Friend!
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
Aug. 10, 2006 - Being vs. doing