The Contenders

• Mar. 27, 2006 - Spending Money: Frivolity vs. Responsibility

My apologies for a lack of debate the last week.  I was nearly run over by the rat race.  That's what I get for standing in the middle of the track!

 

I've had a couple of debate ideas sent to me, thank you!  I could still use more, so keep those ideas coming. 

 

Old Business:

 

- Try contending for the side you don't believe in.  Homy711 commented that it might be hard to contend for the side you don't believe in, without doing it sarcastically.  She was also curious about an example.  Sagerats gave an example of this in the oatmeal vs. peanut butter cookie debate.  Sagerats would much rather have debated for oatmeal, but after reading a few comments opted to contend for peanut butter.  Granted there isn't much to be disgusted about with the side of peanut butter unless you detest it, but instead of basing her arguments on feelings, sagerats based her arguments on facts that she googled up. 

 

- Remember, a good argument is always based on the FACTS, not FEELINGS. 

 

- As always a judge is needed for each debate.  I'm only asking you to judge one debate, not to be a permanent judge.  You can't leave an argument for either side in the debate but you can leave your thoughts before letting us know which side of the debate had the stronger arguments.  Look at past debate conclusions to see how it works.

 

New Business:

 

This weeks debate idea is courtesy of homy711.  While this is really a matter of personal oppinion, and could be based on different circumstances, homy711 could use some advice in this area.  I have decided to allow it as a debate because I felt that many of you could contend for your side with scripture.  I also felt it might just encourage some teens to take part in contending for their own money in a non-threatening atmosphere.

 

The Debate

 

Should your child be allowed to spend his money any way he chooses (frivolous), or should he be responsible for the expenses of his own activities?

Post A Comment!

• Mar. 27, 2006 - For frivolous

Posted by ronandjess
A child should not be bogged down with that type of responsibility, in training, we need to have a purpose for what we teach, what purpose is financial responsibility to a seven year old boy, when all of his "needs" are provided to him by Mom and Dad? When that boy has that shiny new colt .45 cap gun in his sights, financial responsibility means remembering to empty your piggy bank.
Permanent Link

• Apr. 1, 2006 - Moderation

Posted by DreweLlyn
I hate to not weigh in on this debate, especially since only one other person has, yet, I can't really come down solid on either side. Regardless of the age, children need to learn responsibility with their finances as soon as they have finances to be responsible with. Even a four year old can set aside 10% for Jesus and another small percentage for savings (for something bigger they may want later). Then the rest can be spent on what they want. As they get older and "make" more money, they can be responsible for more of their "needs". But, I think there should always be some money to spend frivolously.
Permanent Link

About Me

This is a safe and fun debate blog based on Jude 3-4 and Acts 17:11

JudeThree Links

Home
View my profile
Archives
Email Me

Links

The Rules
It's Debatable
Truthtree.com

Members

creativehsmom
KarenW
DreweLlyn
bensrib
JavaMama
mamaduso
Lazycreek
homy711
sagerats
Eyebright
Momof5littlewomen
Kristal
grace4gayle

ronandjess
Homeschooling6
telmar
humpty
Kekoa
sajolley

Stats

Entry 8 of 18
Last Page | Next Page