Musings of a Mentor
Aug. 24, 2006

WEM chapter 7

This is my third attempt to type these notes up. I have lost them 2 times, once due to human error(mine) and once because we lost our connection just after I hit the post button!

The History of History

A historian isn't just supposed to tell you what happened, but to explain WHY it happened.

The metaphor on pg 164 is very helpful to me: Novelist --can make the woman any race, age, time, dress etc that she wants. Historian --can emphaisis any part of the scene she wants, but can't change the factual information of time, place, age race....

It is up to the historian to discern the facts from the myth.

The chart on page 166 is a very helpful visual picture of how the historian's point of view or philosophy affected the way they recorded their 'facts'.

The Greeks defined the border between myth and fact.

Medieval historians saw interlinked stories decreed by God.

Linear time was reinforced in the Renaissance with the idea of becoming and man's mind providing the highest peak.

Enlightenment scholars thought man had to use reason based on the physical senses with the mind being the main 'enlightener'. Freedom to find the truth. No miracles just unexplained science.

Germans of the Positivism period defined secondary and primary sources. History coming about because of physical fctors was stressed.

Progress-ism, this one really shifted a light bulb on for me.... in Augustine's world we were descending from perfection, in the world of a progressive we were ascending to perfection......this would make a huge difference in how a historian would record events.

History of the poor or Multiculturalism is the study of previously ignored people. Historians had to go to primary sources never used before like tax records, inventories, ads, wage stubs.....All histoy is individual, coherence flattens the meaning.

Romantics saw man boosted by gusts of imagination and creativity (by a divine being, spiritual world)... not by reason alone. Herder organized history around Nationalism. It was a short step from loving your nation to demanding matery of 'lesser' nations.

It is all relative anyway, in Relativism. We can't know today what we will know tomorrow. No absolute truth, everyone's story is worthy. Even the researcher himself can't be trusted. All national history is only telling one point of view or is only true for some of the people of that nation.

The Skeptical historian rejected the power of reason to come to any conclusions about human existence. It produced both preverse history and new and complex scholarships in history.

In Postmodernism the linear idea of time is again thrown out the window. No simple conclusions are offered, no truths, no pronouncements about man or history. Mostly 'micro-histories'.

It worries me that Western's think individuality is the highest pinnacle to be reached. I personally believe it is better to define of oneself as a part of a community BEFORE figuring out who I am as an individual. This idea that when we are all complete individuals history will end is very disturbing to me.







• Comments (5) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


Aug. 19, 2006

WEM chapter 6

What I found most interesting in this chapter was how autobiographies have changed. As I was reading the chapter I kept thinking to myself, "I haven't read enough autobiographies!"

This quote meant a lot to me "the autobiographer's backward gaze doesn't just tell events --it sees them as part of a design that exists only because the writer has decided that one explanation (and no other) makes sense of his life."

I think this is what makes autobiographies special, I know that if I wrote the story of my life, it would be very different than if my daughter did or my husband or a perfect stranger years after my death. Motive and understanding give different events (those watershed moments) totally different meanings.

Then you have the changes in the way people think....."discovering atruth that is more important than historical fact"....."the idea of the subconscious and the elusive self"......"having to figure out the why behind feelings and actions"....

I think Susan makes a explains very well how these changes in autobiographies are just reflections of how society has a whole was shifting its thinking. It adds another level of reading the autobiography for me.

I was fasinated to think about women's autobiographies as expressing their struggles through male eyes. It dawned on me the only female autobiography I have ever read is Helen Keller's. It was interesting to note that while biographers often see women as forcible and full of conviction, in their autobiographies they see themselves as passively called to activism. I find that difference very intriguing!

When reading about the "black autobiography" and how the authors tried to fit their story into a "white" format and how their story really began with the recognition of their blackness I was a little sad, but I was also very proud of those that were brave enough to begin the process at all! I have read Frederick Douglass' autobiography and it pushes me to not give up on educating any child!

"Autobiography allows the writer to recreate his own life, to read meaning back into past events, to give shape and sense to what has been meaningless."

"You read an autobiography to find out what it's like to see the world from another point of veiw, from inside the skin of another person."

"A reader of an autobiography is hoping for a map through trackless waters, a handbook to the deep interior spaces."


These three quotes have really inspried me to try more autobiographies! When I read the suggested choices I was shocked I had only read about 4 of them. This is an area of reading I need to work on.

How to actually read one:
Grammar
Look for central events to help develop a theme.

Look for actual historical events that changed the author or how the author affected history.

Look for the most important person or people in the author's life. Since we define ourselves against others this will be very important to show how the author felt he was unique.

Logic
Do you think your theme and the author's theme for the book match?

Where is the "great truth" discovered, does that strengthen the theme?

Mark all the confessions and justifications!

Who would the author be if she could be perfect?

How did the author stop the story? The stopping point more than just about any other point, will lead the way to what the author thought was the theme of their life (so far).

Rhetoric
Is the author writing for himself or a group? Is he pointing out his uniqueness or leading a group?

Think about the time frames: when it happened, when it was written down, when you are reading it. What happened between all thoses times?

Be aware that you are reading with contemporary glasses on! Ask Do I agree? What would I have done?

Do you reach the same or a different conclusion about the pattern of the writer's life? What do you take away from this story?


In the past I have always thought of autobiographies as pretty boring, but given some of her recommendations and these new questions I feel ready to tackle a few more. I think Confessions will always hold a very special place in my heart and I do highly recommend it!
• Comments (0) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


Aug. 11, 2006

WEM chp5

I found her novel divisions and definitions very helpful. Her history of a novel in 10 minutes took a bit longer than 10 minutes to totally digest though :) The examples she gave to illustrate each style, helped me draw the lines of division clearer in my head than they have ever been before.

Her grammar stage notes were very detailed. I thought a bit excessive with an adult reader, I use many of the questions with kids and teens, but I think they are over kill for most novels. One suggestion she makes that I found very, very helpful when teaching the Illiad was keeping the list of characters and a running geneology of both the humans and the gods. When the kids had to keep these lists near them while we read it help tremendously!

In the Logic stage, I liked her questions a lot and have used similar ones to help delve into the novel's heart. I like making a distinction between fable and chronicle too. I personally expect much more out of fables than I do out of chronicles.

I only use the Rhetoric stage with a few books myself and even fewer with the teens. I have found it often takes the magic out of a really good story. In this stage I prefer to talk about how this novel changed me, how does it make me reflect upon my life and choices, is it a universal story or really stuck in one place and time? Does the way I feel about certain characters reveal something about me? And the one that I make every one answer about every book we read, why is this book still being read after X numbers of centuries.....?

I like her choice of important books and think that at least being familiar with these stories that are such a huge part of our social make-up is very important for a well educated person.
• Comments (2) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


Aug. 9, 2006

WEM chp 4

First thoughts:


Read all the way through without stopping the first time you are introducing the book to yourself.


Mark in your books!


To understand a book you need to be able to answer: -what; -why; - so what?


A reading partner keeps you accountable and on track.


When answering questions, it helps to stay focused.


When trying to understand, organize your notes into a rough outline and give the book or section a short title and a detailed subtitle.


Plan on reading a book more than once.


Second reading I asked myself her questions,


What did I read, well the above notes cover that pretty well.


Why did she write it, to help and encourage others in their self-education journey. She is sharing her experience and what has worked for her and many others with methods that have worked for generations.


So what? I find the methods helpful reviews of everything I have been taught over my life about reading. I will continue to use the methods and her work helps me focus my thoughts when teach others about reading.


As far as Don Quixote goes, I don't want to reread it now because I am scheduled to reread it with some seniors this spring. I wouldn't mind watching one of the movies or Operas based on it though just refresh the story in our minds as a group.

• Comments (0) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


Aug. 6, 2006

WEM chapters 2 and 3

These are my very short notes from chapters two and three. I am just putting them here in one place in case I ever want to print them and make a journal for this book.

Chapter 2
Working with difficult passages develops wisdom. Wisdom marks or changes you forever.

Gathering facts is a totally different skill and does not lead to wisdom or enlightenment.

Some people may need help with the mechanics of reading and vocabulary building.

Chapter 3
My notes are very similar to those already posted about the chapter, so I thought I would post how I take notes.

If it is a book I know I really want to study, I buy a good hardback copy. Then I write in it. I have tried many times to use separate journals or noteboks, they just don't work for me, too much rewriting so I don't stick with it. Keeping my notes on the computer has been helpful, but it is still just typing up what I have already written in the book.

I read the chapter or the section once through before I summarize it at the end. The fact that there is usually only half a page or so to summarize helps me pull out the main ideas and not ramble. If something really grabs me while reading I highlight or underline it. Then when I read through a second or third time I write notes, questions, & ponderings in the margins in different color inks depending on why I am studying the book.

Notes and ponderings I tend to write in blue ink. Questions are almost always in red because I want to go back and see if they ever get answered. If they aren't answered in the book, I try to do research on my own to find the answer.

• Comments (0) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


Jul. 28, 2006

WEM Chapter 1

Here are my first notes after the first reading of chapter 1:


Self education is about reading good books in chronological order and discussing them with friends.


You must carve out the time to do this and guard that time well.


Start small and work up (just like in the gym) with length of time, difficulty of the work, and the length of the piece.


Earlier in the day is better for the mind than later.


Stay away from the computer before before the scheduled reading time. The medium of the internet is not conducive to reading weightier material.


Trivium, taste, swallow and digest what you are reading.


Things I underlined and ideas I revisited on the second and third readings of chapter 1:


In America, to be civilized we must read! I had never thought about the fact that in Europe and the Middle East, you live a few thousand years of history because it is all around you. Here few things that have been preserved are more then a couple hundred years old at best.


Women have always found ways to learn. I loved that Ms Chamberlain thought of her book club as “a peace offering to a hungry mind.”


This statement hit me like a ton of bricks because I think I say it a few times a week when taking to parents! “To convince people that they must learn to study is the major obstacle,” Foster writes, “Most people assume that because they know how to read words they know how to study.” “Study is an exacting art involving a labyrinth of details.”


Since I really love Dorothy Sayers, her quote is one I reread all the time too. This part is the what I strive to remember, “They learn everything except the art of learning.” It hits home that that is my job. Teach the art of learning. The subjects are secondary to the ability to learn.


Jefferson and Sigourney reinforce reading in a time line approach. I think sometimes it is easier to read a modern version of something before reading it in the older works, but for the most part this is how I teach and how I have learned so much myself.

• Comments (2) • Post A Comment! • Permanent Link


About Me

I hope my blog inspires dreamers to dream big and leaves wisdom seekers a little wiser. :)

Links

• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• My Blog's RSS

Friends

• julie
• ClassicalEducation4Me
• LeadershipEducation
• leebenvic
• LaMereAcademy
•
• 1crazylady5kids
• Kentucky
• SteveWalden
• WingsAsEagles
• Somerschool
• leslienoelani
• homeskool
• TRINITYPREPSCHOOL
•
• mamatc
•
• jmj403
• RollsLife
•
• arajbrown
• ihopeyoudance
• TheresaMarie
• eclecticityTia
• tiredmom
•
• BowlingforShakespeare
• nothinbutgirls
• briannash
• TeacherPerson
• TeamNewman
• kysthinkingtime
• twimmer
• SusanneB

Categories

What Type of Homeschooler Are You?

Galileo - If it is worth learning, it has been printed
in Latin. You want your children to have a
classical education. You teach the Trivium of
grammar, logic, and rhetoric, and the Quadrivium
of arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy.
Ancient history is fascinating to you, and you
own several Greenleaf Guides to prove it.
Visit my blog:
http://www.GuiltFreeHomeschooling.blogspot.com

Take this quiz!


Quizilla | Join
| Make A Quiz | More Quizzes | Grab Code
PageEntry 1 of 1
Last Page | Next Page