Posted in RightStart Mathematics
RigthStart Math vs. Other Math Programs and Standardized
Testing
Below are
a few posts from the RightStart Yahoo group to give you a first hand knowledge
of how RightStart Math compares to other math programs and how children using
RightStart Math do on Standardized Tests. Thank you to all the members of the RightStart Yahoo group
who have given me permission to share their posts!
Truly,
Britta McColl R
Mom to 7
Children
Morning
Star Learning
Discount on all RightStart
Math Kits at:
www.morningstarlearning.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From
the RightStart
Yahoo group:
My Son Improved with RightStart Math
Sherri,
Be
sure to check out RightStart. I've used ABeka, Sadlier-Oxford and Saxon. My
son is a VERY visual learner and wasn't retaining math facts.
Just
this year with RightStart Math he went from being unable to remember 2+3 without
using his fingers to mentally adding (taught to visualize) 89+77.
I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't
seen it with my own eyes. Reinforcement is taught by playing games.
They are learning and having a great time at the same time. He begs me to
play math games.
All
the best!
Becki in
OR
RightStart vs. Shiller and Singapore
Math
Hi Laurie,
I wanted to respond to your post, since
I've used both RightStart and Shiller.
In my mind there is no comparison, RightStart is far superior in
methodology, variety of materials used (especially the abacus) and the logical
yet gentle progression of material.
I used Shiller with dd6 for K level. She liked it at first, but the
activities bounced around in content too much for her and retention was
low. I then tried Singapore, which was
frustrating for both of us because math is her most challenging subject and for
me there was not enough guidance for the teacher, so I felt I was not explaining
things clearly (and I'm a former engineer).
Then we started RightStart Level B when she was halfway through first
grade. She's learning so much its
fantastic, and the more I use it, I really appreciate how well thought-out the
program is. I must admit she still
doesn't love math, but I think she'd feel that way with whatever program we
use. She's also not a big
card-game lover, so we haven't played the games much other than the assignment
they're introduced, but she's still progressing very well. We're starting RightStart Level C next week.
HTH,
Nancy from MA
---------------------------------------------------------------
RightStart vs. Many other Math Programs
I have used EVERYTHING! I love math, but my daughter has
floundered over the years. She has
some learning quirks (who doesn't?).
I used Montessori, as best I could when she was preschool age and her
mathematical understanding was phenomenal. At five she told me, from looking at an analog clock,
"It's 8:43, that's 17 minutes till nine, that's 5*3+2!). I didn't really know where to go with
her. I made my own stuff for her
for a while, but then since we belonged to a charter school we needed
paperwork.
We did Saxon, Singapore, Horizons,
Math-U-See, until she just really hates math. I really hated Saxon because there is no BIG Picture
involved just tons of rote learning.
I liked Singapore because the big picture was there, but she got to the
point she really hated math. Even
now. She goes into a rage and says
she hates math. This is really
sad, because I took the math out of her head and put it on paper and she lost
it all.
I am so happy to have found RightStart. I like that there is one main
manipulative that they don't have to count. The activities are low stress. My daughter is 10.5 and we got a second hand copy of Level C
(2nd grade, when she is in 5th) because we needed to go back to a place where
there was no stress. We still find
interesting things in the lessons and the games really help. The worksheets have a small amount of
practice so it is not as intimidating as other programs. And we've come back to the big picture.
I have started my son, age 4, on RightStart Level A, and he is
happily progressing. I plan to
stay with it even if we come to a place he is not ready. I will do what others have suggested,
which is to play the games and wait.
I had to do that for my daughter when Singapore math was subtracting in
level 2 (I didn't realize children in Singapore start school at 7--big
maturational difference).
I love RightStart because math
really makes sense. I used to be a
classroom teacher and I felt so sorry for the kids with the way the math books
jumped from topic to topic in a really disconnected way. It was so hard for the children to
understand the BIG PICTURE, but with RightStart (and Montessori)
it is there from the beginning and just built on. The concept of our base ten system is essential to all
mathematics and so many people (a surprising number of my college-educated
friends) don't get it.
As far as changing curriculums, sometimes a
program just doesn't fit. Sometimes nothing fits--I just have to wait and have
faith in the process. However, I have seen almost everything (except Shiller,
but I was never really drawn to it--I used to be an educational consultant for
a homeschool charter so even what I didn't personally use, I have seen) and
RightStart is elegant and meaningful.
Good luck in your decision making and home
schooling.
Tracy
Right Start vs Math U See
Hi There,
I started my daughter out on Math U See (MUS) for K and
she did ok with it. The one thing that I didn't like about MUS was that the
numbers are all associated with a color. All of their "rods" are just
that "rods" so the kids can't figure out which number it is without
the color to go with it or by counting on the rod.
We are now doing RightStart (RS) with her and I am also
doing RS with my K son. I must say I LOVE RightStart compared to MUS. It makes them
think in their heads as well with their eyes, ears, and fingers. RS gives them
the tools they need to figure any problem out WITHOUT colored "rods".
It is much easier to picture the
abacus in your mind then long colored rods.
Also I think testing will be much easier with RS. As I
said the tools are being put in their minds!
Carrie
------------------------------------------------------
RightStart vs. Math U See
(MUS)
We've
not actually started RightStart yet so I can't do a direct comparison but we did use MUS for a
while.
The things I liked about MUS:
*The explanations for place value were
right on for my son
*It
was easy to use
*Not a
lot of little pieces to get lost (just the rods)
*The
homework pages are unintimidating
* My
visual learner liked the videos
*Taught to mastery
What I didn't like about MUS:
* It's
not as comprehensive as other programs, needs much
supplementing
*Once
my kids got the concept of place value they were bored to
tears
*Not
enough variety in manipulatives (very important for some
kids)
*After
a while it was just horrendously boring to teach
*It simply
felt like my kids weren't really learning important math
skills
*Simply
not a good fit for interactive learners
*The
audio cd did nothing to help my kids learn skip counting, etc.
G in
OR
RightStart Math and Standardized Testing
Q.
My daughter is in second grade and will finish level C this school year. It
is required that she be tested in the spring of 3rd grade - next April. I'm wondering, for those of you who have any experience with
this, how well does RightStart prepare a child for standardized tests by
3rd grade? We'll be using RS Level D at that point.
Any
insights? Thanks.
Wanda
A. My
daughter did the 3rd grade ITBS (testing) after several months of RightStart
Level D. It
was her best year ever -- we test every year, and had transitioned into RightStart
during the fall of that year. She even did well on the timed test, much
to my surprise.
G in VA
Test Scores Excellent!
My Daughter
Likes Math Much Better!
I know
that others have recently inquired as to test performance for RightStart users. My 3rd grade daughter
just finished Level D of RightStart, and we just got her ITBS scores in today. Although she is just
one student, I hope this can offer reassurance to those concerned about scores.
Her percentiles in the various math categories ranged from 94 to 99.
This was
her first year testing, so I don't know how she would have done with her prior
math program, but I do know that her conceptual understanding is much, much
better now. She has even commented on that. Also, she likes math much
better now.
Louise