Little Women
• Aug. 28, 2006 - YOWSER! Schools and churches and.......Oh, My!
My sister has a blog on Townhall, so now I get
their daily "list of important blogs" email. I got this from one of
them. Dashes are mine, in case anyone has a content protector that
would not enable them to read certain words. I took out the
"commentary" sections. What is left is what he states as "facts."
(He does, of course, have a lot more commentary.)
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KevinMcCullough/2006/08/27/why_liberals_are_crushing_dissent
"...this week in one of the boldest moves yet by a sitting liberal,
Democrat Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez proclaimed, "The real purpose of
SB 1437 is to outlaw traditional perspectives on marriage and family in
the state school system."
He continued, "The way you correct a wrong (perspective) is by
outlawing.’Cause if you don't outlaw it, then people's biases tend to
take over and dominate the perspective and the point of view."
Nunez's solution to the people he disagrees with is to outlaw their ability to disagree with him.
...Nunez and his fellow democrats in the California State Assembly
voted in unison to pass four bills that are all designed to punish
people who disagree with them. ...
The bills in question have passed both houses and await Governor
Schwarzenegger's signature or veto. The bills were unanimously embraced
by the Democrats and universally denounced by the Republicans.
But [what] do they say?
These four bills would require that in every classroom from
kindergarten through high school that perverse s-x--l activity be
praised and highlighted in a positive light. They would require
textbooks many of which would then also be produced for other states
beyond the borders of California make positive references to the ideas
of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school
districts from being able to bar females from displaying d-ld-s on the
outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional s-x--lity courses from
K-12 they would require positive explanation of the merits and
instruction of -n-l interc--rse.
These four bills are also dangerous in what they outlaw. No single
teacher - not even in science classes - would be allowed to talk about
the negative health impact of h-m-s-x--l behavior. No school counselor
would be allowed to confirm to a m-l-sted student that they felt wrong
about continuing in a h-m-s-x--l relationship that they were primarily
drawn into because of earlier m-l-st-tion to begin with. No mention of
moral aspects of s-x--l behavior would be permitted unless immoral
activity were praised and in fact referred to as moral....
But one of the bills goes a step further. Its actual purpose is to
cripple any state resources such as fire department or police
protection for any religious institution (i.e. a Bible based church)
that would in any way demonstrate negative "doctrine" or "propaganda".
So if an arsonist (who also just happened to be a radical activist)
decided to burn down a church that was in their view teaching the
faithful interpretation of scripture as it relates to s-x--l practice -
then the local fire company could be barred from assisting in the
recovery and protection of said facility. "
_________________
|
Post A Comment! :: Send to a Friend!
|
|
|
|
|
