Chronicles of a family at home
Jan. 31, 2008
Latest mystery: Fluoride (part 1)

Posted in nebulous rants

I love a good mystery.  Especially ones with signs of conspiracies and cover-ups and government complicity.  Probably a symptom of WAAAY too much Robert Ludlum and Tom Clancy reading, back when I used to have free, uninterrupted time.

My latest case as an amateur sleuth began with a decree to add fluoride to the public water supply from our local mayor, a former lawyer and political party leader.  I thought these strange credentials in making healthcare decisions for the community, and since I strenuously believe that nothing he does is motivated by anything good, it bore looking into.

The two week odyssey of research took me from the 1930s through the present, to Sarnia, Ontario, and other disparate places like Hooper Bay, Alaska; Bauxite, Arkansas; and the Aluminum Company of America. Not to mention from science to junk science and on through the politics of expediency. 

First of all, let me just say that, like with the terms "homeschooler" and "alien," I am aware that there is an immediate and visceral reaction to the term "opponent of fluoride."  You know instantly that all homeschoolers are dressed in jumpers, are ultra-conservative Christians, and have a dozen children.  You immediately know that all "resident aliens" are actually illegal aliens.  And you equally assume all opponents of fluoride are either quacks or kooks.  (Or maybe you don't have the same visceral reaction because those of you reading this are also homeschoolers?)  But as a friend of mine said to me last week:  "Just because they are kooks doesn't mean they are wrong."  Reminded me of that old chestnut, "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you."

Either way, a fresh look at the evidence on safety and efficacy of fluoride may reveal to you the uneasy truth that while there may be evidence of its effectiveness in reducing dental caries, and while it is frequently repeated that it is economical, you may actually come up dry on hard evidence that it is safe.  I aspire to demonstrate this using facts not garnered from "kooks," but from the Belly of the Beast itself.

Look for Part 2, coming soon to this blog, near you.






 



""
""

Post A Comment! Send to a Friend!


Comments

Feb. 4, 2008 - Sarnia, eh?

Posted by anotherblogonthefire


... and you didn't stop in?
Oh, btw... speaking of fluoride - we learned this weekend that the juice from pickled beets acts just like those pink tablets we chewed in elementary school to see all of the spots we missed while brushing our teeth.


Permanent Link


Feb. 4, 2008 - ah yes....

Posted by bestsister


the fluoride debate. Just like the immunization debate. It makes people look at you funny. We have had this conversation many times. I can't wait to see your part 2. I'm sure I'll agree whole heartedly!


Permanent Link


Feb. 4, 2008 - You go get 'em!

Posted by sharonkay


I of course agree with you on this one!

There is plenty of research to show that peoples throughout history who have eaten a whole-food diet, and not consumed the quantities of sugar that we do in the West, did not need flouride. They had strong teeth and bones. Introduction of sugar to a culture is what caused everyone's teeth to fall out of their heads.

Like many things in the West, we want the little magic pill, and do not want to do the hard work required to avoid unpleasantries. (Probably not a word!)

My kids happily gulp our unflouridated, unchlorinated, well-water and relish the sweetness of it. My family has not one dental carrie in our 5 heads. We may have other holes in our heads, but not the dental kind!:)

I look forward to Part 2 as well!


Permanent Link