There and Back Again

...And What Happened After. The Tale of the Great Ring, compiled by Bilbo Baggins from his own observations and the accounts of his friends. What we did in the War of the Ring as seen by the Little People."


Jul. 15, 2007

Land of Marvels

Iguazu Falls

A little more than half a century ago, there lived a man called Richard Halliburton, a man who lived his dreams.  When he was a child he promised himself that one day he would travel the world, and when he became a man, he did. 

He went to see awesome waterfalls, mountains, rivers, statues, castles, cathedrals, temples, cities, and other amazing sights around the world.  His life was one of adventure.  He climbed the Matterhorn, the beautiful volcanic Mt. Popo in Mexico, the rock of Gibraltar, and the dome of St. Peter’s Cathedral.  He swam the Panama Canal, witnessed the building of the Golden Gate Bridge, and went to the ‘ornament and honor of France,’ Reims Cathedral, the place in which Joan of Arc witnessed the crowning of Charles VII.

He not only dived 70 feet into the Well of Death in Mexico to see what it was like to be a sacrifice, but he dived into it twice!  He went to Christophe’s Castle in Haiti, the Grand Canyon, Iguazu Falls, (see picture above) and Carcassone, the French city of romance.  He crossed the Alps on an elephant to see how Hannibal must have felt on his way to attack Rome, and he went to see the ancient Parthenon in Greece.  He visited the ruins of Pompeii, under the shadow of Mt. Vesuvius, and he explored the unearthly fairy caverns of the Blue Grotto.  He traveled to many other places also that I do not have the time to mention, but the places I have mentioned are only a few. 

In 1937, he published his adventures in a book called the Occident, or the Book of Marvels.  Occident means west, because the places he spoke of in the book were the places he had been to on the western side of the world.  I read it this year, and his glowing description of the world’s wonders was truly breath-taking. 

But he did more than that.  The Occident was only half of his travels.  He wrote another book called the Orient.  Orient means east, because this book covered his adventures on the other side of the world, the oriental side.  Unfortunately, I have not had the chance to read it, but I am sure it is worth reading!  I recommend both of them!

- Legolas

Comments (1) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Feb. 13, 2007

The Silmarillion

Recently, a friend sent me The Quenta Silmarillion, (translated as, ‘the history of the Silmarils,) a book written by J. R. R. Tolkien about the first and second ages of Middle-earth.  Tolkien considered it his most important work, but it was not published until four years after his death.  Unfortunately, he never quite finished it, even though it was begun before the Lord of the Rings.  I have been reading it for the past month and I really, really  like it.  It is now my second favorite-book - well, I haven’t finished it, but I am almost done and unless the plot changes drastically within the last few chapters, it will remain my second-favorite book. 

 

While reading it, I noticed several interesting likenesses between Tolkien’s works and ancient mythology.  To those of you who have read it, I would like to mention how the name Avallone, you will remember, a city built in Tol Eressea to which the Elves sailed in later years, has a great resemblance to Avalon, an island in King Arthur, to which Arthur went, after receiving his death wound.  And another resemblance is Melkor; though he later became a spirit of darkness, first endeavored to have Light under his dominion and use Light, instead of Darkness for his evil schemes.  His greatest enemy, Varda, being the Queen of Light, rendered this plan unsuccessful, but it is interesting to point out that Lucifer was the Angel of Light before his downfall.

 

Considering how it corresponds with the theme of my blog, I decided the Silmarillion deserves a post.  For those of you who have not read it, I will give a short summary.  (the book is written in somewhat archaic language, but trust me, it is more than worth reading.) 

The book centers around the creation of the Silmarils, three priceless jewels made by the Elf Feanor. 

The Silmarils are stolen by Melkor, a ‘Vala’ (very much in resemblance to Sauron, only of greater power.)  The greater part of the book is spent on recounting the pursuit of Feanor and his sons, and their incredible quest to regain the Silmarils.  Tragedies, misfortunes and tremendous battles follow each other, one after another until, in the end, the Silmarils are wrested from the iron crown of Melkor, only to be lost, one in sea, one in the earth, and one in the heavens.  Among others, woven into this magnificent tale of bravery and heroism, is the moving romantic saga of Beren and Luthien;

Also a powerful narrative of the incredible Wars of Beleriand, the tale of the destruction of the great island of Numenor, and the marvelous quest of Earendil, the mariner.  The book also contains an amazing account of the creation of the Ainur, of the making of Middle-earth and Valinor, the awakening of Elves and Men, the rebellion of Melkor and the War of the Powers.

 

Are you enthralled yet, or should I continue about the creation and destruction of Utumno; the great underground fortress of Melkor, the Music of the Ainur, the making of the sun and moon, the Two Trees of Valinor, Ungoliant; the great spider, the Valaraukar; demons of fire and shadow, and legend of Tol Eressea; the Lonely Isle?

 

Besides The Lord of the Rings, it is the highest on my top list of recommended books.  It is truly a wonderful tale of courage, suffering and valor.

 - Legolas

  

Comments (5) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Jan. 10, 2007

The Cat of Bubastes

     I recently finished The Cat of Bubastes, a book on Ancient Egypt written by G. A. Henty.  It is a story that takes place during the time of Thutmose III.  This ambitious Pharoah attacks the tribe of the Rebu and, defeating their city, brings to Egypt as captive, Amuba, the son of the late Rebu king.  He and his guardian, Jethro are taken as servants of Ameres, the high priest of Osiris.  They soon become close friends of Ameres, and his son and daughter, Chebron and Mysa. 

     After a time they learn that Ameres has interesting views on religion that are not consistent with those of the rest of Egypt and they discover the true meaning of 'religion,’ its origin, and who the gods really are.

     Life goes on, peaceful and tranquil, until suddenly a tragedy strikes when Chebron accidentally slays the sacred Cat of Bubastes.  In Egypt, the sacred animals are held in great regard, and to inflict hurt upon them means death.  The offender of the gods is discovered, the priest slain, and Chebron forced to flee for his life accompanied by his friends.  They intend to flee to the land of the Rebu, but the journey is long and dangerous, and upon arriving there, after many trials, they find the Egyptians in control of the city, and the throne usurped.  The situation looks hopeless…but…

     You will have to read the book to know the rest!  I really enjoyed it and highly recommend it.

 - Legolas

Comments (7) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Nov. 29, 2006

Albert Einstein: Genius. But Was He a Hero?

I recently finished reading a book about Einstein written by Stephanie S. McPherson called The Story of Albert Einstein.  It relates the story of his life and discusses, in brief, several of his theories.  Upon reading the book I received a fairly negative impression of his character.  He was rebellious in youth, considerably fickle and opposed authority not only in childhood, but also throughout his life.  I am going to give a short summary I have written of his life from information I have gained from McPherson’s and Cwiklik’s books on Einstein. I would like to explain his theories in a later post.

 

“Albert Einstein was born a Jew in Ulm, Germany, 1879.  His parents, Pauline and Hermann, put him in a Catholic school.  He excelled in science and math and could play the violin well, but failed miserably in all other subjects.  When his father’s business failed, his parents departed to Milan, Italy to begin a new factory.  Fifteen-year old Albert was left behind to study for his diploma, but suffering from boredom, he feigned illness so that he could go to Italy with his parents.  Right before his departure he was expelled from school for his rebellious behavior.  Albert fell in love with Italy and expressed his wish to denounce his German citizenship.  Permission was denied and Albert was sent to Zurich, Switzerland to study for engineering at the Polytechnic School.  While there, he denounced his German citizenship and became a man without a country.  He managed to stay in school this time but he earned a bad reputation for his behavior because he was, even at this early age, developing ideas about light and wanted to go far beyond the concepts his teachers discussed.  At the age of twenty-one he received his diploma but no professor was willing to work with him because of his ill reputation, so he found himself unemployed. 

 

While at the school he met a girl called Mileva Maric and fell in love with her.  When a friend suggested he get a job at the Swiss Patent Office in Berne, he disliked the idea but his relatives cut off his allowances and he found he had to support himself.  After being employed, he married Mileva Maric in 1903.  From then on he continued working with his theories and published his General Theory of Relativity and his Special Theory of Relativity.  Meanwhile, he generally ignored his wife until at last a gradual barrier began to develop between them.  Their first child, a girl, Lieserl, was born before their marriage and she disappeared soon after.  It is generally believed that they sent her to an orphanage!  Then Mileva gave birth to two boys, Hans Albert and Eduard. 

 

When Albert was offered an appointment in Berlin, he moved back to Germany.  While there, World War I broke out and Albert became a pacifist and created a statement against war.  Only six people signed, including himself.  His wife and children moved back to Switzerland, and Albert became attached to his cousin Elsa.  He divorced his wife and married Elsa several months later.  Elsa had been divorced once and had two grown daughters, Ilse and Margot, whom Albert adopted. 

 

As Albert saw the suffering and persecution of the Jews around him, he decided that the best way to demonstrate his support was to become a German citizen again, and he did.  And again, he worked at physics in his free time.  Later, at the outbreak of World War II, horrified at the German cruelty, he again renounced his German citizenship, took up an American one and settled in America and began teaching in Princeton University.  He felt that that was not enough; that only force would stop Germany and he renounced his views on pacifism.  Fearing Germany would develop an atomic bomb before the rest of the world, he wrote a letter to President Roosevelt urging him to quicken the development of the atomic bomb in America.  His third letter inspired the Manhattan Project.  Then he began working on his Unified Field Theory, but he died on April 18, 1955, before he finished it.

 

I read this definition of a genius last week and I think that it is a correct one:  ‘A genius is a person who has invested all his ability, fortune, thought and labor into one interest and therefore he excels in that one interest and men call him a genius.’  

 

“Geniuses” tend to excel in one thing, and since all other subjects are ignored except that one, they are usually undisciplined, unable to control emotions well and are entirely consumed by that one interest.  If that is the correct definition for a genius, Albert Einstein qualified for the title, but whether or not it is an honorable one is debatable.

 

McPherson wrote her book for children, and littered the facts with a good deal of her own opinion, which was very positive.  But the truth remained obvious.  Of course, I don’t mean by all this that Einstein's disposition was completely negative, but overall, he did not prove to have a strong character.

 

- Legolas

 

Comments (8) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Nov. 20, 2006

In Defense Of "The Lord Of The Rings"

 

Recently, I have read many different writings concerning the works of the late professor J.R.R. Tolkien, primarily The Lord Of The Rings which is undoubtedly his greatest masterpiece. However, while reading his histories and notes, I have learned some things that may help people who are struggling with the issue of 'magic.'

 I have noticed that some critics believe this trilogy is wicked and even claim it is full of witchcraft, comparing it to J.K Rowling’s Harry Potter  and other such stories. I would like to say that I believe these arguments to be entirely groundless and I will now do my best to disprove them and point out something great and inspirational in his books.

One problem that many people have with Tolkien’s books is that he uses magical elements in them. In Deut 18: 9-14 and Ex 22:18 the use of magic, witchcraft and all other forms of divination is clearly forbidden to us. Yet Tolkien, a strict Roman Catholic, still uses such elements in his books! Why is this?

Well, here is an interesting question: what is “magic,” really?  “Magic” really means “power.” The reason that we look on it with such abhorrence is that it was originally, and generally is today, power given to people by demons.  This is sometimes called “witchcraft” (although witches will deny this) It is always utterly wrong- no matter what purpose it is used for. This is really the type of magic referred to in the Bible from which God commands the people of Israel to abstain. However, the word 'magic' doesn't always mean the same thing.  There is “illusion” which is not “magic” at all but is actually just a trick played on the eyes.  Magic tricks with cards are an example of this or when a man on stage tricks the crowd.

Then there is “fairytale magic” which is entirely pretend. It is the make-believe kind of magic that allows the “little fairies to turn toy bunnies into real rabbits” and it is lavishly used in fairy-tales and has nothing to do with witchcraft (Although some fairytales have witchcraft in them but almost always this person is portrayed as wicked.)  Tolkien took the word 'magic' and used it, as well.  But why? And why did he write his books in the way he did? 

Well, when you write a story that has supernatural elements in it, you have two choices: The first is to refer openly to God and angels, etc. When you do this, your writing will be clear and understood, but nonbelievers will not necessarily be interested in your story and you will not always reach everyone who could benefit from your work. The second choice you have when writing such a story is to use  fairytale elements which is something everyone can understand and relate to.  Who doesn't know the story of Sleeping Beauty?   C.S. Lewis and Tolkien both chose this way of writing, taking pagan beliefs and culture, discarding what they thought was not acceptable and putting everything else under the authority of the one true King, thus redeeming mythology by extracting truth from it.” 

Now, one important fact about Tolkien’s books that many people miss is  that Middle-Earth is a different world than ours. When Tolkien wrote The Lord Of The Rings he was creating a different reality. The world he created had different rules than ours with different creatures altogether.  It was make-believe.  This world had a creator named Eru Iluvatar, meaning 'One Father of All'. It also had the Ainur, who worked for Eru and were powerful beings.  They had different levels of power. These can be likened to angels on our earth.  In fact, one of these beings revolted against Eru and came to Middle Earth and was evil Sauron's boss.  (Doesn't that sound like Satan?)  Well, Gandalf was also one of these beings who served Eru.  He was not a human.  Neither was Saruman who had also revolted against Eru.  When you understand that Tolkien's world was actually very similar to the Bible, you realize that he was not misusing magic at all! 

Tolkien explained in one of his letters that the Elves “magic” was really an advanced form of art.  And if you notice, the Elves cannot do anything spectacular like the wizards (angels) but they can create unnaturally beautiful things.  At first, this may seem a little peculiar but consider this: The Elves are not like the mortal men.  They are immortal and were created before Men.  They have, therefore, special rights not granted to Men. Men, Hobbits, and Dwarves are not allowed to use magic!

 Some people mistakenly think Gandalf is a figure of Christ.  This is not true.  He was merely a being like an angel.  And after he defeated the dark spirit in the Mines of Moria, he seems to have been promoted to a type of archangel.  Because Tolkien used the word, 'wizard', this has confused and frightened some people.  But when you begin to understand what he meant, you realize it has nothing to do with the definition of 'wizard' in the sense of one using witchcraft.

The Lord Of The Rings trilogy centers mainly around Frodo’s quest to destroy the Ring of Power and Aragorn’s return to the throne which rightfully belongs to him. Frodo and Aragorn (along with their other companions) are not allowed to use magic and the story does not focus on that. This was a hedge Tolkien put around his book so that the story would not make people want to study magic but would really draw their attention to the lives of people who fulfilled their task without using magic but by making right choices.

In Tolkien’s world of Middle Earth, he redeems magic by defining it as “power” again. He invents a new world but the more you read about his world, the more you realize how much he borrowed from what he knew and believed about our world. He does this because he wants to show us things that we may not want to accept if he does not disguise them.  Just as Jesus used stories to reach the crowds, Tolkien has attempted to do the same.

I am going to close this article with a quote from Tolkien:

 

“After all, I believe that legends and myths are largely made of “truth” and, indeed present aspects of it that can only be received in this mode; and long ago certain truths and modes of this kind were discovered and must always reappear.” –J.R.R. Tolkien 

 

-Frodo

 

Comments (10) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Nov. 3, 2006

In Defense of the Chronicles of Narnia

                         

 

I have heard some people condemn C. S. Lewis’ ‘Chronicles of Narnia’ and accuse the books of dealing in the occult.  Before I begin this I would like to state my utter abhorrence of witchcraft and anything concerning the occult.  The Bible clearly forbids witchcraft in Deuteronomy 18: 9-14, Revelation 22:14 b and other places.  Chronicles of Narnia does have witchcraft in the stories; but only the evil ones use it. Jadis, (or the White Witch) used her magic wand that turned people to stone and her magic bottle of liquid that produced the Turkish delight. Yes, the evil side of Narnia does use witchcraft.  That is why it is evil. Notice that Jadis is called a Witch.  These books clearly showed that witchcraft was bad and not to be tampered with.  For instance, when Lucy found a book with spells in it, she tried to make herself beautiful. Aslan appeared and roared growled with warning, and she quickly stopped.

 

One thing that confuses people is the use of the word ‘magic’ in the Narnia series. C. S. Lewis used that word when he spoke of the ‘deeper magic,’ in the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe,

“ ‘It means,' said Aslan that though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know…' "

 The words magic there have NOTHING to do with the occult. Mar. Lewis used this word to describe the Law of the Emperor Across the Sea.  Because that is what it means- law.  That ‘deeper magic’ was a law that was put in the Universe before the dawn of time.  Notice that that magic is not used. It is there.

 

Another thing that many people have problems with is Lewis’ use of mythological creatures such as Fauns, Centaurs, Naiads, Dryads, Hamadryads, Silvans, Bacchus, Maenads, Silenus and others.  Example:

 

“Bacchus and his Maenads leaping, rushing and turning somersaults, the beasts brushing round them, and Silenus and his donkey bringing up the rear. And every-one sat down in a wide circle around it. Then Bacchus and Silenus and the Maenads began a dance, far wilder than the dance of the trees, not merely a dance for fun and beauty (though it was that too), but a magic dance of plenty, and where their hands touched, and where their feet fell, the feast came into existence. 

“He seemed to have a great many names - Bromios, Bassareus, and the Ram were three of them. There were a lot of girls with him, as wild as he. There was even, unexpectedly, someone on a donkey. And everybody was laughing: and everyone was shouting out, ‘EUAN, EUAN, EU-oi-oi-oi.’”

In mythology fauns were rural deities of nature and fertility, but they also did wicked things.  Centaurs were also wicked in general and Bacchus was a pagan god.  The Maenads were hysterical girls driven to lunacy in his (Bacchus’) cult.  So… how does this work?

 

Lewis knew all of this, but he appreciated mythology because, as I know, it has many beautiful and heroic elements in it, as well.  So he took the parts that he liked and put them into his fantasy world of Narnia, but put them under Aslan’s (Christ’s) rule.  Since there can be no sin under Aslan’s rule the evil things about them disappeared and their beautiful qualities remained. 

" I asked myself, 'Supposing that there really was a world like Narnia and supposing it had (like our world) gone wrong and supposing Christ wanted to go into that world and save it (as He did ours) what might have happened?'

 The stories are my answers. Since Narnia is a world of Talking Beasts, I thought He would become a Talking Beast there, as He became a man here. I pictured Him becoming a lion there because (a) the lion is supposed to be the king of beasts; (b) Christ is called "The Lion of Judah" in the Bible; (c) I'd been having strange dreams about lions when I began writing the work. The whole series works out like this.

 

The Magician's Nephew tells the Creation and how evil entered Narnia.

The Lion, etc. the Crucifixion and Resurrection.

Prince Caspian restoration of the true religion after corruption.

The Horse and His Boy the calling and conversion of a heathen.

The Voyage of the "Dawn Treader" the spiritual life (especially in Reepicheep).

The Silver Chair the continuing war with the powers of darkness.

The Last Battle the coming of the Antichrist (the Ape), the end of the world and the Last Judgement."

What the Chronicles of Narnia really are is a wonderful, entertaining series of books that portray the Gospel message clearly in a lovely, simple way that is enjoyable at any age.  If you have never read these books I highly recommend them. 

 

- Legolas

Comments (11) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Sep. 23, 2006

Bridge To Terebithia

 

            I read this book recently and was very moved. It is an amazing book but a very hard book. I don’t mean, of course, that the style or language is hard. It’s just that the book is hard. It is hard to accept, hard to take in, hard to understand.

The story is about a boy named Jess Aarons who wants to be the fastest runner in his fifth grade class. All throughout his summer break, he gets up early every morning to practice running on his family’s farm. When he finally goes back to school, he is confident that there is no one in his grade who can run as fast as he can. Then, a new girl walks over to the boy’s side of the playground and outdistances him easily. At first, Jess is a little annoyed but soon he and Leslie become close friends. Jess was just a lonely boy but Leslie begins to show him secrets about life that that he never knew before. Together, Jess and Leslie create the magical and secret world of Terebithia, which they rule over, and no one else can enter their special kingdom. Then, one rainy day, Jess loses Leslie. She slips quietly out of his life just like she had slipped into it. It is then that Jess must figure out if he is able to live life alone.

The thing I thought was most interesting about the book was the contrast between Leslie’s family and Jess’ family. Jess lives on a farm with his parents and four sisters. His family is not rich and has financial struggles but you would still expect a rather happy family. Jess’ family isn’t happy. His older sisters are bossy and silly. His littlest sister is spoiled and his mother is always cross and sharp. His father is always tired and he doesn’t understand Jess at all. Only his other little sister, May Belle is a friend to him and even she is only six, after all.

Leslie’s family is different. She has no siblings and both of her parents are authors. They love her and they moved out into the country simply for her sake. They didn’t want to get too caught up in money and success and as Leslie tells Jess “They wanted to focus on the things that really matter.”

Doesn’t it seem strange, then, that it is Jess’ family who goes to church and Leslie’s that have never gone? This part of the book is what caught my attention the most. Jess’ family is going to the Easter service at their church and Leslie asks if she can come as well. Jess tells her that it is boring and she will wish she had not come but Leslie is firm. During the service, Jess pays no attention to what the preacher is saying. He knows the story all too well and he is not interested in hearing it again. Afterwards the following conversation takes place between him and Leslie:

 

“Gee, I’m really glad I came.” (said Leslie) Jess turned to Leslie in disbelief. “It was better than a movie.”

“You’re kidding.”

“No, I’m not.” And she wasn’t. He could tell by her face. That whole Jesus thing is really interesting isn’t it?”

“What d’you mean?”

“All of those people wanting to kill him when he hadn’t done anything to hurt them.” She hesitated. “It’s really kind of a beautiful story-like Abraham Lincoln or Socrates-or Aslan.”

“It ain’t beautiful,” May Belle broke in, “it’s scary. Nailing holes right through somebody’s hand.”

“May Belle’s right.” Jess reached down into the deepest pit of his mind. “It’s because we’re all vile sinners that God made Jesus die.”

“Do you think that’s true.”

He was shocked. “It’s in the Bible, Leslie.”

She looked at him as if she were going to argue, then seemed to change her mind. “It’s crazy isn’t it?” She shook her head. “You have to believe it but you hate it. I don’t have to believe it, and I think it’s beautiful.”

 

Isn’t this too common? People who have to believe the Bible often hate it. And then, sometimes there are those people who don’t have to believe it but do because they love it and think it is beautiful.

 

Frodo

 

Comments (12) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Jul. 14, 2006

'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea' review

'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea' Review

 

            I have just finished reading 'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea.' It is a great book and I really enjoyed it.

            It is written in first person and tells the story of three friends, Frenchman Professor Arranox, who is the character narrating the story, his faithful servant Conseil, and the Canadian harpooner Ned Land. The book relates their adventures after they join an expedition to rid the seas of a monstrous narwhale and are suddenly thrown from their ship onto the Nautilus, the underwater vessel of the mysterious Captain Nemo.

            While there, they experience the wonders of the oceans depths. Fiery tempered Ned Land is always seeking a way to escape from Captain Nemo and his companions and finds no enjoyment in the underwater world tour he is experiencing. The Professor and his servant are less eager to escape; until they uncover the Captain's plans.

            Captain Nemo is a strange man, cut off from land and man alike for reasons they do not know, and in search of refuge in the depths of the underwater world. Having isolated himself from the upper world, he seeks vengeance for the wrongs he has suffered at the hands of mankind. I felt very sorry for this man.

            This book illustrates in detail the character of the four main persons involved, viewing them in their strengths and weaknesses and the hand of Jules Verne also beautifully paints the marvels of the sea throughout this it.

            I highly recommend it. It is a definite must-read and is one of my favorites.

 

-Legolas

 

Comments (2) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Jul. 7, 2006

Pride and Prejudice

 

            We finished reading Pride and Prejudice together last week. I enjoyed it so much that I have decided to post a book review about it. So allow yourself to be swept into the Victorian days...

           ...The lively young Elizabeth Bennet, living in the Victorian era of England, is faced with all of the difficulties of courtship that girls her age had to encounter. Her family is not extraordinarily wealthy but she is expected to marry as advantageously as possible. When a rich young man, Charles Bingley, moves into the estate next to their own, Mrs. Bennet is eager to become acquainted with him in hopes that he will marry one of her daughters. Soon Elizabeth realizes that Mr. Bingley is in love with her older sister, Jane.  But just as everyone begins to expect their engagement, Mr. Bingley's handsome friend, Mr. Darcy, steps into the scene and changes the situation immediately by separating the two. As Elizabeth becomes acquainted with him, she decides that he is a proud, disagreeable man and she grows to dislike him. This dislike is heightened by an interview with one of his former associates, George Wickham, who tells her of all that he suffered at Mr. Darcy's hands. Elizabeth is enraged and forms a firm opinion of Darcy's selfishness and pride. Her resentment begins to melt, however, when she visits his home and sees how he is loved by other people who have known him all of their lives.

             I think that Jane Austen makes two main points in the book. First of all, she talks about pride and how it causes people to look down on others simply because they are not on the same economic level.

            Secondly, she shows how criticism can prejudice us against people. In the story, the two sisters, Jane and Elizabeth are very close friends but differ in many of their ideas and ways of thinking. Jane always wants to believe the best of everyone and is never hasty to condemn but tries to defend and excuse everyone. Elizabeth, on the other hand, never allows herself to be deceived and is quick to point out everyone's faults because she herself can see them only too well. She grows critical and prejudiced against people because she is looking for their faults instead of their good points.  

            I enjoyed Pride and Prejudice very much because the author helped me to understand the dangers of pride and prejudice without preaching to me.  She wove important truths subtly into the story. I think that even young men would like this book because it is not just a romance. 

 

Frodo

 

Comments (6) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Jun. 13, 2006

My Thoughts on The Redwall Series

Over the past few years, I have heard some people compare the Redwall books with The Lord of The Rings series.  Actually, the Redwall books are very different from the LOTR. It is true that both deal with fantasy and good vs. evil but there the resemblance ceases. The Redwall books deal in intense violence and bloodshed all throughout the books. There is evil in the LOTR too but in LOTR, I think that the evil is not so graphic even though it is, in my opinion, a darker evil. Of course, in the end of both books, good wins and evil is conquered but is that a good enough reason to fill a story with a lot of harsh talk and cruel characters? I agree with the fact that it is necessary to make your readers understand how wicked the evil characters are but I think that this can be done without using so much violence and rough language. It is very easy to tell who is wicked in the LOTR but Tolkien still does not use so much of what Sam calls "orc-talk" in his books. The Redwall books dwell so much on the evil side of the story. To state it simply, I think that the LOTR are inspiring books, whereas the Redwall series are really just rough adventure tales.

            Another difference between the LOTR trilogy and the Redwall series is that in the LOTR, the characters and creatures are either invented or used in other stories but they are all more or less, "human" in their looks and speech. In the Redwall books, the characters are animals that dress and talk like humans. I do not think that nature should be changed like that and turned into something evil. After all, rats aren't, by nature, evil creatures. They are just innocent animals.  I know this is just a preference of mine, but I love nature and have a hard time looking at sparrows, owls and other animals in the same way, after I read some of the Redwall Series. I don’t know, I just feel like the author tampered with God’s creation too much.

            Of course, all this doesn't mean that the Redwall books are bad like some books are. I just think that they are not really good enough to be worth my time.  Dissenting opinions are welcome, but please don’t throw stones. 

 

Frodo

 

 

 

Comments (2) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


May. 27, 2006

'The Return of the King' Critique

 

            Legolas and I finally finished reading the Lord of the Rings trilogy by Tolkien and so last night we had a party and watched the movie, "The Return of the King" for the first time. I was very impressed with the special effects and the acting. They played their parts very well and almost all of them looked pretty much how I imagined them. I thought that Aragorn was wonderful. He was so kingly and calm, and yet, he was a warrior and a ranger as well and he knew everything about fighting and the wild.

            Legolas was great, too. I really liked the scene where he climbs up the arrows on the elephant's back and cuts the rope that holds the whole group of Southrons. He was certainly never afraid of anything. Gandalf was fantastic! He was the perfect emblem of good and even when Denethor had despaired and called the retreat, Gandalf kept fighting.

            Having read so much mythology where the heroes go to the realms of the dead, or the underworld, I thought it very interesting that Aragorn went through the Paths of the Dead, inside the mountain, to summon the oath-breakers to fulfill their oaths

             I don't think that the script was as good as in the other two movies. There were not as many good lines and I got the impression that the movie-makers got tired of making the movie and rushed through the last part without stopping to think of some really good lines. For instance at Aragorn's coronation I expected him to say something a little more stirring and magnificent. He should have made an admirable speech that could really encourage his people.

.           In the book, Gollum did not deceive Frodo like he did in the movie but I think that the movie shows just how base the ring had made Gollum. He told Frodo a bunch of lies, promised not to harm him, but then he deserted him in Shelob's cave to die. It also shows how the ring blinded Frodo to the truth so that he chose a slinking, skulking, sneak like Gollum over Sam, his best friend who loved him and was even giving him his share of the food and water. Sam was an incredible hero to push through to save Frodo even after Frodo sent him home and went with Gollum and, in the end, Frodo realized that Sam was his real friend when Sam risked everything to rescue him in Cirith Ungol.

            I thought that Peter Jackson did a great job portraying evil and how ugly it is. He made the Orcs simply disgusting and as soon as I saw Minas Morgul, I knew that it was evil. The contrast between good and evil is so sharp that when you look at the battle scenes, you just know which side is evil and which side is good.

            Overall, I really enjoyed the books and the movies. The books are very well-written and the movies are incredible, too. They are full of adventure and they inspire you to be a hero in this life. And they teach us that fairytales really are true because one day the King really will return.

 

Frodo

 

 

Comments (5) Post A Comment! Permanent Link


Apr. 21, 2006

The Two Towers Critique

I just finished reading ‘The Two Towers.’ I saw the movie recently. I think that Peter Jackson is an expert at movie making. (at least better than I would be.) He portrays evil very well but he dilutes the noble and good character. For instance, I was very disappointed in Faramir. The Faramir in the book was noble and wise. He did not wish for power and he did not take the ring. Don’t mistake me. He certainly did not want Minas Tirith to fall, but he was discerning enough to know the ring would not help. And even if he was not, he would not take the ring for he told Frodo, before he knew about it that, ‘were it lying on a highway I would not take it.’ He would not break his word. The movie Faramir, on the other hand, would take the ring by force. I was so upset when he said, ‘the ring will go to Gondor.’ I think Peter Jackson is afraid of the good and tries to change it. There was absolutely no reason to change Faramir’s character. I was very disappointed in the change he made.
             In the movie I do not think the Ents were portrayed very accurately. In the book they are slow, but wise and ancient. I don’t think Peter Jackson should have had the Ents not agree to attack Isengard at all. And Peregrin Took should not have been able to trick them into going towards Isengard. I prefer the movie to stay true to the story.

But there was a change Peter Jackson made that I did like. I like how Sméagol tells Gollum to, ‘go away and never come back.’ It reminds me of the casting out of evil spirits.  But, in the Bible it says that when one demon is cast out seven others even stronger will come. That is what happened to Gollum because he got angry at Frodo thinking he had betrayed him.

Those are my thoughts about ‘The Two Towers.’ But don’t mistake me, I still love the movie, i just like the book better.

 

Legolas

 

 

Comments (7) Post A Comment! Permanent Link



Our Quest

"All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us..." GANDALF

The purpose of this blog is to record the ideas that are most important to us. We are two sisters who choose to go by the names of Frodo and Legolas. You will find poems and quotes, narrations and pictures from our favorite sources that have inspired us to use the time that has been given to us to the best of our ability. We hope you will enjoy the journey there and back again....

Frodo and Legolas





bagend_mov

Bag End

Home
View Our profile
Shire Archives
Our Blog's RSS
Frodo's Sketches




Beyond The Shire


Lord of the Kingdom
Arwen Undomiel-our favorite LotR fan-site!
Our Mom's Neat Blog
Skopeo Literary Society
Blogheader Artist
What's Your Middle Earth Name?
Beyond The Loneliest Star
God in the Bush
Earth is Crammed with Heaven


nominee
BEST TEEN BLOG




TheRebelution.com: Enlist Today







Bilbo_EE_2

Bilbo's Bookshelf

About the Land of Turkey
Book Reviews and Movies too
Poems worth Reading
More Poems worth Reading
Languages
Science
History
Art
Stories
Nature Notes
Deep Thoughts
More Deep Thoughts
Flotsam and Jetsam




frodobook2

Frodo is Reading...

The Birth of Britain
The Brendan Voyage
Beautiful Girlhood
The Lay of the Land
Ivanhoe
• Trial and Triumph
Age of Chivalry
Fearfully And Wonderfully Made
• How to Read a Book
• The Story of Painting
Life of Nicias by Plutarch
The Silmarillion
The Final Quest
A Taste of Chaucer
Joan of Arc by Twain
Idylls of the King
Much Ado about Nothing
A Wrinkle In Time
Life of the Spider
How the Heather Looks
• Pursuit of God
Daughter of Time
In Freedom's Cause
Lilith
• David Copperfield





legolassparklesnowavatar

Legolas is Reading...

The Silmarillion
Halliburton's Book of Marvels: The Occident
Age of Fable
Life of Nicias by Plutarch
The Story of the Greeks
Augustus Caesar's World
The Sea Around Us
Hittite Warrior
Animal Farm
Magician's Nephew (in Turkish)
Archimedes and the Door of Science
Swiss Family Robinson
What Katy Did
• Unfinished Tales
Where the Red Fern Grows
Follow My Leader
Penrod
Story of the Romans
Along Came Galileo
Jack and Jill
Never Give In
Valley of Thorns (in Turkish)
• Ben Hur



ttt_gla_glb

The Fellowship

BlogBoy
Cornflower
Mariel

giftedgirl

Kalene
Eyebright
IceJet
Boomer
OutdoorGirl
KayinPA
opckid
Gollum

HRTF
Inklings
Striker

BookFreak
TheEntomologist

arwengirl
Kekoa
rjdjohn316
Jocelyndixon
SuperAngel
barbieheart
JacqueDixonSoulRestES
Creator
Ruach
nikisnotebook

roaringkitten
antelopehead
bushkins
PevensieGirls
mandygrace
Lukelee
riverthomas
RockStar
youwithoutme
sleeper
Isaiahstorm
TheLordsDaughter

MerryandPippin
LOTRLounge
OneBlogToRuleThemAll
DixonContestBlog
totustuus

Chris
SingaporeGirl
AuthorElf
VirtuousMaidens
Rose
BrielleCostumes
MyrtleDimpleOfHardbottle
EldestOf5
Lioness

longleggedgirl

LeviDen
melon
mainekid1
pixiedust
nancysnook
GirlofGod
Sparkles
LifeSong
CamtheMan
Bluejane
Sweettunes
POTCgirl


tolkien

The Myth

"The value of the myth is that it
takes all the things we know and
restores to them the rich
significance which has been hidden
by the veil of familiarity . . .
By putting bread, gold, horse, apple
or the very roads into a myth,
we do not retreat from reality:
we rediscover it. As long as the
story lingers in our mind,
the real things are more themselves.
[The Lord of the Rings]
applies the treatment not only
to bread or apple but to good and evil,
to our endless perils, our anguish
and our joys. By dipping them in myth
we see them more clearly. I do not
think [Tolkien] could have done it
in any other way.”
- C.S. Lewis


frodoglobe


The Music

INTO THE WEST by Yulia



The Movie

LORD OF THE RINGS
The Return of the King




'When the seas and mountains fall
And we come to end of days
In the dark I hear a call
Calling me there
I will go there
And back again'


Banner


The Books




Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Homeschooling

Page 1 of 1
Last Page | Next Page


wedding