Posted in Lecture 1: Love, the Sum of all Virtue
|
...And this charity is here spoken of,
as that which is, in a distinguishing manner, the great and essential
thing: which will appear more fully when we observe, Secondly,
what things are mentioned as being in vain without it, viz.: the most
excellent things that ever belong to natural men; the most excellent
privileges, and the most excellent performances. First, the most excellent privileges, such as preaching with tongues, the gift of prophecy, understanding all mysteries, faith to remove mountains, etc.; and Secondly, the most excellent performances, such as giving all one's goods to feed the poor, and the body to burned, etc. Greater things than these, no natural man ever had or did, and they are the kind of things in which men are exceedingly prone to trust; and yet the apostle declares that if we have them all, and have not charity, we are nothing. The doctrine taught, then, is this: THAT ALL THE VIRTUE THAT IS SAVING, AND THAT DISTINGUISHES TRUE CHRISTIANS FROM OTHERS, IS SUMMED UP IN CHRISTIAN LOVE. This appears from the words of the text, because so many other things are mentioned that natural men may have, and the things mentioned are of the highest kind it is possible they should have, both of privilege and performance and yet it is said they all avail nothing without this, whereas if any of them were saving, they would avail something without it. Cat's Q & A: 1. More and more commonly, it seems, I read books that list a variety of people who are assumed to be great Christians. (The "Jesus Freaks" books from Bethany House come to mind.) The reasoning is that if they could be killed or persecuted for what they believed in, they must have truly been saved. Do you think you could die to defend your house from burglars? Your country from terrorists? Do you think it's reasonable for the Christian pop culture to assume that because someone died for a cherished belief about God, they must have gone to heaven? Lots of Muslims have died for something that cannot save them, on the conviction that it could. Just because we are told we're going to get to heaven because of such-and-such, doesn't make it so. There has to be corollating, visible, non-falsified evidence to back up the invisible spiritual propositions. 2. Do you believe, based on the passage and the points that Edwards makes, that things like speaking in tongues, doing things in the name of Jesus, or performing miraculous healings are proof that a person is a Christian? No. I never did. One of my first close encounters of the Christianized kind, as an unsaved teen, involved going to a youth revival meeting. People were "speaking in tongues" and being "slain in the Spirit." Thing was, I was well involved in the occult, and the spiritual tone of the room was quite familiar to me. I've since learned that there must be a purpose to such manifestations, and if the purpose (Rom. 8:28) and the results of the actions (Jer. 17:10, scary verse, read it) don't match what God's stated in the Bible, then those things just don't go cha-ching. 3. Do you believe unsaved people can speak in tongues? Yep. |
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
