Friday, August 7, 2009
Convergent Evolution
This was originally posted on The HSB Backyard (I write the Animal Facts column every week). Be sure to stop by and see the other fun things on the Backyard!
Hello everyone! Today we will stray from looking at just
one animal so that we can learn about convergent evolution. Don't let the long words confuse you -- it is really quite simple. Simple for us who believe in creation, that is. For evolutionists, convergent evolution is a big problem. In order to understand why, you must first understand the theory of evolution.
The theory of evolution, very simply put, is that all of a sudden, a bunch of non-living chemicals suddenly came to life to form a very, very simple organism. Over millions of years, and many generations of reproducing and experiencing random mutations to the genetic code, this very simple organism evolved into the complex life forms we see today -- fish, horses, birds, monkeys, humans, etc.
Now, evolutionists have what is called the "evolutionary tree," and this is a diagram of how these organisms branched out to evolve into different animals. For example, one organism started evolving into a frog, while another evolved into a horse. The evolutionists make the assumption that animals with similar traits evolved from a common ancestor. Animals that are very different are placed on opposite sides of the tree.
Here's where convergent evolution comes into play: some animals are so different that they are placed on opposite sides of the tree, but yet they share a common trait! In other words, the two different species supposedly evolved from two different ancestors, so the trait they had in common had to evolve twice! Are you following me? Let me give you a few examples of this.
The Wolf
Most wolves give birth to their young like all other mammals do. But there is one wolf -- the Tasmanian wolf, which carries its babies in a pouch, just like a kangaroo does. Now, evolutionists place marsupials on the other side of the evolutionary tree from other mammals that give birth in the usual way. So this means that the Tasmanian wolf had to evolve separately from the common timber wolf! What nonsense.
Flight
Did you know that, according to evolutionists, flight had to evolve
four different times? See, there are four different groups that can fly. We have birds, flying insects, flying mammals, and flying reptiles (which are extinct now, however). Flight is such a miracle that it is impossible that it could have randomly evolved once, let alone four different times.
Eyes
Squids and humans have eyes that are very similar. It is very easy to see that an evolutionist would not group humans and squids with the same ancestor. But yet our eyes evolved twice?! Sorry, I don't think so!
Those are just a few examples of convergent evolution; there are many more. And this is only one problem with the theory of evolution. There are many, many, many more! Did you know there are
no problems with creation? That's because it's true. God made all the life on this planet in just three days! There is no such thing as lower life forms evolving into our "modern" life forms. If someone tries to tell you so, ask them about convergent evolution and see what they say!
Comments
Sunday, August 16, 2009 - Howdy
Posted by BookwormMN
Well done, bravo!! It's so fun to find out more facts to prove evolution wrong! :o)
I'm glad you like the picture of Anna - that's the only picture that I took that I posted.
Hope you've been having a great Sunday!
~Amber
• Permanent Link
Sunday, August 16, 2009 - Untitled Comment
Posted by wonderland21
Miss Alizona,
We sang Before the Throne of God Above in church this morning, and it went great!
I may post a video on my blog sometime.
~~Allison
• Permanent Link
Monday, August 17, 2009 - Untitled Comment
Posted by Bluejane
Yeah, it was a very nice surprise!
We are just doing a lesson a day in The Fallacy Detective. I'm really enjoying to so far though!
Out of the Blue:jane
• Permanent Link
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 - Untitled Comment
Posted by Eyebright
I agree wholeheartedly with what you said. Susanna Wesley's 16 rules were not mean, they were just firm. Growing up under those rules would probably instill a very good character into a child!
Have a very bright, very cheerful day!
Miss Eyebright
• Permanent Link
Thursday, August 20, 2009 - Untitled Comment
Posted by Bluejane
Hi, I know I already replied to your comment once, but I realized I didn't answer your question about the tiny url, and I didn't think you would mind another one. :P
Tiny url is just a website where you go and enter a url, and they make is smaller. So if you ever have one of those big long and drawn out annoying urls and need to share it with someone, you can just go have a tiny url made. It can be very handy!
Out of the Blue:jane
• Permanent Link
Sunday, September 13, 2009 - from Mrs. Dixon
Posted by http://trainingdaughtersteachingwives.com
Hi Alison~
VERY interesting post!! I love it that we can let our children learn all this truth as home school families!!
I came over here to find a link to put you on the SSLinks at TDTW, and noticed the blogroll didn't get transferred with your new template.
I don't know if I don't have have your mom's email or if I just missed you all when I emailed. I have updated the TDTW blogroll; we have our own site, and I am adding and removing interested or uninterested bloggers. :)
I hope you will want to continue on with the blogroll, but if you don't that's ok too. Please let me know one way or the other. If you want to stay on, you can add the blogroll from the code on this page: http://trainingdaughtersteachingwives.com/?page_id=83
You can contact me here to let me know one way or the other: http://trainingdaughtersteachingwives.com/?page_id=805
:)
Blessings dear~
Mrs. D
• Permanent Link
Entry
15
of 218
Last Page | Next Page