Principled Discovery

Jun. 8, 2006

Homeschooling Alone Cannot Solve the Education Crisis

Posted in education
These are the children that homeschooling will not work for. They're lost in the system and there really is no way out for them. A young woman who at 15 attempted suicide because she saw no other way out of an abusive relationship. A young man who writes of his previous addiction:

When a soldier filled with strength,
becomes a victim of the game,
Many things change.
People see your face and turn away.
They wanna love ya,
They wanna hug ya,
But they simply can't trust ya,
Because you're filled with an evil product.

This is why I do not feel the church can give up on public education. Not that we can somehow change the system with its inherent flaws. However, unlike many, I do not think children going away from home to learn is necessarily the root of the problem. Children in Jesus' day were educated outside the home in the synagogue (scroll to the bottom). The difference was in accountability and purpose. The father was the authority in education and the purpose was to learn Torah.

There are working solutions out there. Earlier today, I highligted the Carver Academy. That is a model I sincerely believe that churches should consider as they spend millions of dollars in building projects, including youth gyms, private schools and coffee bars.

There is a second model gaining a bit of attention recently. Community schools, such as Blue Ox, are being highlighted as Bill Gates and others have come behind them in support. And they are producing some impressive statistics. Some of these schools accept only youth who have been expelled from a tradtional school and still somehow maintain the same, and in some cases higher, graduation rates. Their purposes are wholly secular: to prepare youth for the workplace.

But shouldn't the church offer something? At the founding of our free and public education, the goals of equipping the youth with knowledge of the scripture was at its core. Several laws required communities to offer schools so that all of its citizenry might have the opportunity to learn to read the scriptures. These schools were not necessarily set up by the church or run by the church. The problem is not so much that the church stepped out of education and let the state take over, but that the state began changing its goals in the early 1800's.

As a Christian, I agree whole heartedly that we should not leave our children in the system which has developed. Most Christian schools sadly have gone the same way. They generally service a clientele a little higher on the socio-economic ladder so are often not plagued with quite the same problems as the public schools. Still, they are oftentimes no different from secular schools in their character and methodology. And what of those who cannot afford it? Or whose situation precludes homeschooling? Most of the children in my class came from Christian homes. 100% were minorities. 98% were on public assistance. 20% lived with someone other than their biological parents. Several lived with only one parent. And that one parent quite likely was a teenager when she gave birth. I don't think homeschooling would have been a viable option for any of them.

We set up missions all over the world and educate youth in the gospel of Christ. We pay for classrooms in Africa, India and South America where teachers instruct indigenous populations in the scriptures as well as academic subjects. Why don't we show any interest in this in our own communities in our own nation?

Post A Comment! Send to a Friend!

Comments

Jun. 8, 2006 - Hearing your heart ~

Posted by AcceptanceWithJoy
I had to read through several of your previous posts to see that we agree on many, many things.

But, I do come from a different, more pessimistic perspective than you. I am not confident that today's culturally relevant mega-church will ever meet the needs of the children highlighted in the North Coast Journal. I parent a child that is much like any one of the children in that article. She came into my heart when she was seven and I adopted her at the age of nine. She has brain damage caused by prenatal exposure to alcohol and had quite a few behavior problems when she first arrived. The church, on the whole, would rather close their eyes to these kids than to care for them.

We must all pray for revival in the church ~
Permanent Link

Jun. 8, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by gottsegnet
I don't know that we disagree so much on that, either. It isn't so much a matter of whether it is likely that the church will answer these needs, but whether it should. And what responsibility we have personally.

It disturbs me to see the amount of money that goes into some church programs to do what? One of the churches in our area is putting up a multi-million dollar family life center. In fact, they have raised over 7 million dollars for their 3,500 seat stadium. Now, their bible teaching is actually rather good, but it seems to me that perhaps that isn't the best use of resources?

If these megachurches were going to answer this need, they would be doing so. They have the resources. The problem as I see it, however, isn't really with the megachurch itself. It is with each individual member.

If each individual member didn't think this were the best use of funds, the funds would not be used this way.

This is an area that I think the church falls painfully short in and this post is as much a criticism of some of these practices as anything. We might be able to argue that it really isn't the responsibility of the church to educate our society. Making disciples of all the nations may or may not really equate with setting up schools for them. But we certainly have a responsibility to educate our own children in the Lord. And I believe that includes making sure that there are viable, Christian options for Christians who sincerely desire this, but lack the resources themselves.

Permanent Link

Jun. 8, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by gottsegnet
oops...forgot one sort of important thing. My optimism does not rest in these megachurches or their resources. It rests in the Lord and the knowledge that if it is His will, nothing can thwart it.

Permanent Link

Jun. 8, 2006 - Thank you for the comment on my blog.

Posted by AcceptanceWithJoy
After having read your response, we are probably on the same page. I had started to write in my previous comment (and then deleted because I was afraid I was going off on a tangent)...

There are 500,000 children in foster care and 125,000 in need of immediate adoptive placement. What a spectacular mission field. With over 300,000 churches in the US, you would think that we would be able to find homes for all the children in need. Why ~ we should even be able to care for some of the orphans in other countries. One child: one church!!!

I too believe that God can do a mighty work. I am saddened to think I have been witness, and perhaps partaker, to what I view as the fall of the "church" in the US.
Permanent Link

Jun. 9, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by gottsegnet
I don't mind tangents, but I don't consider that one, anyway : ) Here's one that has inspired me...I don't remember all the details and my internet search is only turning up one article that has been moved and is no longer available.

The community of La Chambonne is a small village of 5000 in France. It is a Protestant community in the heart of a catholic region. They are used to persecution. It is has always been a part of their history. As Hitler was transporting the Jews of Europe to his camps, few countries provided any resistance. France was one of them. Except in this tiny, Protestant community.

At the encouragement of their pastor, church members began taking in Jewish children whose parents were being deported. I remember one woman interviewed who said that no one wanted to take the teenagers. They were too much trouble and they ate too much. But when they were told that there was no where for them to go, they opened their home to another. What other option was there?

Over the remainder of the war, this community of 5,000 gave shelter to over 5,000 Jewish children. Hiding that many children was no easy task. Feeding that many children in a time of strict food rationing was no easy task. But what option did they have? These children were in need of help and there was no one else to do the task.

This is not the prevailing attitude of the church today.
Permanent Link

About Me

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."--Alexis de Toqueville

Links

Home
View my profile
Archives
Email Me
My Blog's RSS

Friends

UndertheSky
TOSPUBLISHER
LovingHim4Ever
ByHisGraceInColorado
spunkyhomeschool

JillNovak
MamaBugs
Kellyque777
creativehsmom
schooldaze
belindaletchford
LisaQuing
redmom
meandmyhouse
GalacticBlogger
thehsmomof2
Titus2woman
Hutcheson
Manicmondaymomma
dswescott

nebraska
Cre8iveMom
lifeandtimesofanothermom
principledlearner
Raquel
NewHarvest
Michaela
rainbowdash

Honeybee
Dalaimama
SingingHisStory
loughman98
Lazycreek
iluvtheland
JennLovesJesus
mistresninos
Janne
Amber
leslienoelani
chickadee


lovetolearnmom
writmm

AmoScribo

TRINITYPREPSCHOOL
WalkInFaith
danib
telmar

dinomomm
HSmom0f4

Jocelyndixon
SuperAngel
RugbyHS
homeschoolingmommaof4

AussieinAmerica
home4mariah
littleskipper
Keri
onecrazymom
domesticangel
Entry 154 of 419
Last Page | Next Page