|
Poor readers have a variety of characteristics in
common. Their purposes for reading
generally focus on the task at hand: to
get done, to pass a test or because they were told to. They read every text in the same way, whether
it is poetry, a novel, an article, etc.
They tend to focus on the act of reading itself, decoding each word and
then jumping to the next. Reading, for the poor
reader, means decoding and finishing.
They cling to details and ignore ideas, concepts and themes. Remedial reading programs who are purported
to be improving the reading skills of poor readers, generally use methodology
which serves to reinforce these poor skills.
First, they often contain a selection of highly controlled
texts. These texts often have been
written especially for this population.
Authentic literature is not generally offered, or is rewritten with
simpler words and edited for length.
The purpose of the reading instruction is to improve basic
skills. To achieve this, the text is
often glossed. Key words are written in
bold, further encouraging the reader to focus on words rather than ideas. The readers attention is also diverted to a
vocabulary box, further breaking up the flow of the text.
In order to measure progress, students are tested
frequently. These tests are designed to
prove whether or not a student read the material rather than to stimulate then
to higher order thinking and expression.
The questions ask students to recall basic facts and details from the
story, enforcing the poor readers tendency to focus on details and lose the
meaning of the text.
A quick example: From
the Other Side, by Raymond Karelitze and T.J. Falcone. The front cover looks like it is meant for
the remedial reader and the description on the front cover confirms that the
purpose of the text is test prep, not entertainment.
·
1600 critical SAT words used in context.
·
Includes in-context glossary
The back further alienates the student from the true
purposes for reading. In a highlighted
sunburst we learn, Reading
is a key component in the new SAT Examination.
The first sentence in the books description seriously limits the true
scope of reading as a skill:
Reading requires two basic ingredients: concentration and reading skills.
And the actual content, which is
clearly secondary to this texts ability to prepare the student for the
SAT?
Thirteen year
old Billy Steele is running away from home.
He has finally decided that he must seek greater freedom in the streets,
away from parental pressures and school restrictions. Nothing can stop his desire for this
new-found freedom, not until he can discover what freedom really is like in the
adult world beyond.
Truly inspiring subject matter
for the student struggling in school.
|
Jun. 18, 2006 - <i>Untitled Comment</i>
First, the author states on the back cover that concentration is developed by reading something interesting.Oh really? Despite being labeled with "ADHD," my daughter can concentrate for hours while doing something she is interested in. One of the topics I taught was fluid and electrolytes. Guess what? I have read a lot of material covering this topic, even the material that is "Made Incredibly Easy" is not interesting. It is tedious, complicated and only learned through grim determination. Reading for enjoyment is different than reading for understanding.
Second, reading comprehension involves more than just completing a passage, knowing a list of vocabulary words, reciting facts or spewing forth general concepts taken directly from a textbook.
Third, this type of "learning" produces students whom cannot think above a basic understanding of the presented material. True competency is not achieved until, at the very least, the learner can apply what they have learned in a real life situation (and this is just the beginning of excellency).
Teaching the test produces students that ask their instructor things like, "What is going to be on the test." I always told them I would give them a patient scenario, using the data, they had to identify the problem and prioritize their care and select the most important thing that needed to be done for the patient. All of my lectures assumed the student had read the text and we did case study after case study. I was told my tests were too hard.
Guess what, 99.9% of the nurses I train go on to work in small community hospitals. Because as a society we don't "get it," the new nurse with no experience is put on night shift all by themselves. The experienced nurse, having gained enough seniority to move to a day job, is on day shift where there are support staff, physicians and administrators. What do these new nurses do on the night shift? Why they identify patient problems and prioritize interventions. If they failed in identifying a problem? The worse case scenario, the patient dies.
Advanced education is made more dependent on this type of "learning" because faculty evaluation and tenure is determined in large part by student evaluations rather than evaluations by other instructors. Afterall it is the students that are paying their tuition that are the customers of the institution (and not the patients and families that put their trust in the novice nurse).
The faculty members that have made it the easiest on students, given them a "study guide" that was little more than a copy of the test are always the students favorite. As a nurse administrator, I knew the quality of the programs in my area and did not hire new graduates from one of the programs. The students loved their faculty, had a very high pass rate on the nursing boards and were lousy, unsafe practitioners.
By teaching a person to test rather than teaching them to learn, we are limiting the creativity and intellectual capacity of all our citizens.
I would have never investigated this book, thanks for keeping me on my toes as to what is out there ~
Edited by AcceptanceWithJoy on Jun. 18, 2006 at 5:35 PM