Principled Discovery

Jun. 17, 2006

How Not to Read a Book

Posted in education

Poor readers have a variety of characteristics in common.  Their purposes for reading generally focus on the task at hand:  to get done, to pass a test or because they were told to.  They read every text in the same way, whether it is poetry, a novel, an article, etc.  They tend to focus on the act of reading itself, decoding each word and then jumping to the next.  ‘Reading,’ for the poor reader, means decoding and finishing.  They cling to details and ignore ideas, concepts and themes.  Remedial reading programs who are purported to be improving the reading skills of poor readers, generally use methodology which serves to reinforce these poor skills.


First, they often contain a selection of highly controlled texts.  These texts often have been written especially for this population.  Authentic literature is not generally offered, or is rewritten with simpler words and edited for length.

The purpose of the reading instruction is to improve basic skills.  To achieve this, the text is often glossed.  Key words are written in bold, further encouraging the reader to focus on words rather than ideas.  The reader’s attention is also diverted to a vocabulary box, further breaking up the flow of the text.

In order to measure progress, students are tested frequently.  These tests are designed to prove whether or not a student read the material rather than to stimulate then to higher order thinking and expression.  The questions ask students to recall basic facts and details from the story, enforcing the poor reader’s tendency to focus on details and lose the meaning of the text.


A quick example:  From the Other Side, by Raymond Karelitze and T.J. Falcone.  The front cover looks like it is meant for the remedial reader and the description on the front cover confirms that the purpose of the text is test prep, not entertainment.


·        1600 critical SAT words used in context.

·        Includes in-context glossary

 

The back further alienates the student from the true purposes for reading.  In a highlighted sunburst we learn, “Reading is a key component in the new SAT Examination.”  The first sentence in the book’s description seriously limits the true scope of reading as a skill:


Reading requires two basic ingredients:  concentration and reading skills.

 

And the actual content, which is clearly secondary to this text’s ability to prepare the student for the SAT?


Thirteen year old Billy Steele is running away from home.  He has finally decided that he must seek greater freedom in the streets, away from parental pressures and school restrictions.  Nothing can stop his desire for this new-found freedom, not until he can discover what freedom really is like in the adult world beyond.


Truly inspiring subject matter for the student struggling in school.

• Post A Comment! • Send to a Friend!

Comments

Jun. 18, 2006 - <i>Untitled Comment</i>

Posted by
Let's just forget for a moment that the "story" seems to undermine a parents authority. The problem is that the assumptions that allow such rubbish to be written, don't suddenly disappear once the student has passed the SAT and is now a college student. No wonder I had so much trouble teaching nursing students! Let me just count the ways that this whole concept (teaching someone to take a test rather than teaching someone to learn) annoys me:

First, the author states on the back cover that concentration is developed by reading something interesting.Oh really? Despite being labeled with "ADHD," my daughter can concentrate for hours while doing something she is interested in. One of the topics I taught was fluid and electrolytes. Guess what? I have read a lot of material covering this topic, even the material that is "Made Incredibly Easy" is not interesting. It is tedious, complicated and only learned through grim determination. Reading for enjoyment is different than reading for understanding.

Second, reading comprehension involves more than just completing a passage, knowing a list of vocabulary words, reciting facts or spewing forth general concepts taken directly from a textbook.

Third, this type of "learning" produces students whom cannot think above a basic understanding of the presented material. True competency is not achieved until, at the very least, the learner can apply what they have learned in a real life situation (and this is just the beginning of excellency).

Teaching the test produces students that ask their instructor things like, "What is going to be on the test." I always told them I would give them a patient scenario, using the data, they had to identify the problem and prioritize their care and select the most important thing that needed to be done for the patient. All of my lectures assumed the student had read the text and we did case study after case study. I was told my tests were too hard.

Guess what, 99.9% of the nurses I train go on to work in small community hospitals. Because as a society we don't "get it," the new nurse with no experience is put on night shift all by themselves. The experienced nurse, having gained enough seniority to move to a day job, is on day shift where there are support staff, physicians and administrators. What do these new nurses do on the night shift? Why they identify patient problems and prioritize interventions. If they failed in identifying a problem? The worse case scenario, the patient dies.

Advanced education is made more dependent on this type of "learning" because faculty evaluation and tenure is determined in large part by student evaluations rather than evaluations by other instructors. Afterall it is the students that are paying their tuition that are the customers of the institution (and not the patients and families that put their trust in the novice nurse).

The faculty members that have made it the easiest on students, given them a "study guide" that was little more than a copy of the test are always the students favorite. As a nurse administrator, I knew the quality of the programs in my area and did not hire new graduates from one of the programs. The students loved their faculty, had a very high pass rate on the nursing boards and were lousy, unsafe practitioners.

By teaching a person to test rather than teaching them to learn, we are limiting the creativity and intellectual capacity of all our citizens.

I would have never investigated this book, thanks for keeping me on my toes as to what is out there ~

Edited by AcceptanceWithJoy on Jun. 18, 2006 at 5:35 PM
• Permanent Link

Jun. 18, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by gottsegnet
Ok, you've just eliminated any need for me to follow up on this : )

There are lots of books like this out there...the most popular are called text books. I ran across this one at the library. I seriously tried to read it, but it is some tough stuff. It's awkward and unrealistic, not to mention poorly written. The words peppered out are way beyond what any 13 year old would use or understand. And this couple with whose girl he is getting rather intimate with must by at least 40...I don't know. The sexual overtones start on the first page and, well, nevermind. I would object to this material on its writing quality alone.

No Child Left Behind, I'm afraid, will give us many more such texts...
• Permanent Link

About Me

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."--Alexis de Toqueville

Links

• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• My Blog's RSS

Friends

• UndertheSky
• TOSPUBLISHER
• LovingHim4Ever
• ByHisGraceInColorado
• spunkyhomeschool
•
• JillNovak
• MamaBugs
• Kellyque777
• creativehsmom
• schooldaze
• belindaletchford
• LisaQuing
• redmom
• meandmyhouse
• GalacticBlogger
• thehsmomof2
• Titus2woman
• Hutcheson
• Manicmondaymomma
• dswescott
•
• nebraska
• Cre8iveMom
• lifeandtimesofanothermom
• principledlearner
• Raquel
• NewHarvest
• Michaela
• rainbowdash
•
• Honeybee
• Dalaimama
• SingingHisStory
• loughman98
• Lazycreek
• iluvtheland
• JennLovesJesus
• mistresninos
• Janne
• Amber
• leslienoelani
• chickadee
•
•
• lovetolearnmom
• writmm
•
• AmoScribo
•
• TRINITYPREPSCHOOL
• WalkInFaith
• danib
• telmar
•
• dinomomm
• HSmom0f4
•
• Jocelyndixon
• SuperAngel
• RugbyHS
• homeschoolingmommaof4
•
• AussieinAmerica
• home4mariah
• littleskipper
• Keri
• onecrazymom
• domesticangel
Entry 143 of 419
Last Page | Next Page