Principled Discovery

Feb. 5, 2006

What to do if your child thinks he wants to go to public school

Yeah, like I'm the expert and know the perfect answer that will make everyone happy.  But this question was recently asked by Gena over on her blog, and I thought I'd give a stab at my response.  My little seven year old actually has asked why she is homeschooled and can't go to public school like her only friend in our entire town.  She plays school, dutifully sitting at her desk taking notes and learning math facts.

 

Reason the first:

 

And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.

--Deuteronomy 6:7

 

We are to teach the law of the Lord diligently to our children.  The bible talks about tying the law so that it hangs on the forehead and across the hand.  The forehead is symbolic of our worldview.  Our thoughts, beliefs and conversation should reflect a deep faith in Christ.  We should be ready to base all our decisions on the Word of God.  The hand is symbolic of our actions.  True faith does not stop with believing.  Christ said that he who hears his words and does nothing is like the foolish man who built his house on the sand.  The wise man hears His words and acts on them.

 

God's primary educational objective is imparting the knowledge of His law to His children so that they may keep and obey His law.  He outlines how to do this...take the child by your side and discuss the Word of God continually, applying it to every aspect of life.

 

This does not work well in the public school environment.  The teacher isn't going to do it, and there just isn't enough time left in the day for all that sitting and walking by the way that occurs in the family situation.

 

Reason the second:

 

Here is a nice long article about how the father is the head and how that relates to homeschooling.  Essentially, my role is this.  The responsibility of the education of a child falls on the father's shoulders.  He is the leader of the household.  He determines the course for his family.  All teaching is under his authority.  In the ideal model of the public school system which is completely under local control, ie., under the control of the parents whose children attend that school, this would not be an issue.  The teacher would be acting under the authority of the parents.  At least in theory.

 

But our courts have ruled that parents give up their rights as soon as they drop their child off at the school door.  Literally.  I don't think God looks kindly on us abdicating in our roles He has chosen for us, no matter our personal reasons.

 

Reason the third:

 

What REALLY goes on in public school?  It is not about reading and writing and arithmetic.  Just look at what this public school advocate has to say in her assertion that "homeschool is treason." 

 

And she is exactly right.  Not that homeschool is treason, but of her assessment of the true "value" of public education.  She, as a socialist, finds it very positive.  I find it very frightening.

 

Reason the fourth:

 

Children do not have a fully developed capacity for reason.  Mostly their reason is based on what their friends are doing and what they think is "normal."  And sometimes a bit of that "grass is greener on the other side" mentality.  That is why God put parents in authority over their children and told them to honor their parents.  So that it would go well with them.  If children got to do everything they wanted, it would not go well with them.  Even if God did not rig it with that promise about inheriting the land and being fruitful and all that.  Kids make dumb choices, like candy over vegetables, TV over books, Nintendo over the word of God and public school over homeschool.  My son would like to play in the street if I let him. 

 

And my summary argument for my child?  Quoted directly from Katherine Dang of Philomath, "I cannot in good conscience do this thing."

 

When my son needed iron drops for his anemia, I did not reason and coax, plead and beg and eventually give in to the fact that he, at one, did not want to take his medicine.  I, as the informed parent with fully developed reasoning capabilities for the long-term benefits of these drops in comparison to the momentary discomfort of swallowing them, did what any good parent would do.  I sat on him, held his arms down, and forced the drops in the back of his mouth so he got most of it down.  Now he knows there is no option.  Whether or not he understands the benefits, when he has to take medicine, he does not object.  He makes all kinds of faces, but he takes it.

 

tagged: 

• Post A Comment! • Send to a Friend!

Comments

Feb. 6, 2006 - Two Thumbs Up!

Posted by creativehsmom
You hit the nail right on the head!
I also read your post entitled "Homeschool is Treason"
It gets me everytime I read or hear someone saying that parents who homeschool don't allow their children to participate in the "real world"!
Uh..hum, excuse me but how "real to life" is it to place your child in a locked up environment over 8 hours a day, in the midst of learning expect them to change gears at the ringing of a bell not to mention the constyant fear of bullies and environments. If that's what is to be considered real learning, then count this family "out"!
We as homeschoolers can actually take advantage of real life situations in our homes and communities and turn them into "real life learning".

Love,
Cathy
• Permanent Link

Feb. 6, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by JeninNB
Amen! Amen, amen, amen!!! You said it so well.
• Permanent Link

Feb. 7, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by JenIG
this is a great post! but i really came over to say that the last comment you left me made me laugh my head off. you are too funny
• Permanent Link

Feb. 7, 2006 - Great Post!

Posted by Amber
I'd like to see someone argue that!

Guess what, I'm here and no Foxfire!

0:) Amber
• Permanent Link

Feb. 14, 2006 - Homes becoming Adjuncts of the Public School

Posted by Anonymous
You wrote: >>But our courts have ruled that parents give up their rights as soon as they drop their child off at the school door. >>>

In this day and age of many public school-at-home offerings, parents are finding they don't have to make a trip to the school to give up their rights.

An example from Alaska law:
AS 14.03.090. Partisan, Sectarian, or Denominational Doctrines Prohibited.
Partisan, sectarian, or denominational doctrines may not be advocated in a public school during the hours the school is in session. A teacher or school board violating this section may not receive public money.

Here it is applied (look at the fact parents are prohibited from buying religious curriculum and teaching it to their children during school hours--the chldren not just denied receiving credit):

http://www.worldmag.com/subscriber/displayarticle.cfm?id=10985

Armed with a new application of an old statute, Alaska's Department
of Education and Early Development (EED) declared that teaching a
majority of core subjects with religious-based materials—even those
privately purchased—disqualifies parents from receiving government
funds. It employed a 1966 law, which states, "Partisan, sectarian, or
denominational doctrines may not be advocated in a public school
during the hours the school is in session."

Assistant attorney general Kathleen Starsbaugh confirmed EED's
interpretive broadening of the law, labeling private homes as public
schools: "While it uses terminology more easily applied to the
traditional classroom, it applies to public schooling however
delivered." She added that dispensing public money to parents who
rely heavily on religious-themed curricula also violates the Alaska
Constitution and the First Amendment's establishment clause.

~Annette
Keeping Homeschool Freedom Legislative Board:
http://www.keeping.homeschoolfreedom.org
National Charter School Watch:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NCSW/
• Permanent Link

Feb. 14, 2006 - Untitled Comment

Posted by gottsegnet
Interesting...I oppose anyone receiving public monies in their homeschool for this very reason...unless, of course, they are not religious homeschoolers. To my knowledge, we have exactly one truly free and private universty in this nation...I need to look up more info on the topic. But the state was not happy with what they were teaching, so they rejected all public monies. The state then pointed out that students attended their who had state funded scholarships. So the university rejected them as well.
It bothers me...if your child receives a grant or state funded scholarship, s/he is forced to attend a university whose curriculum has been approved by the state. Free exchange of ideas? I think not...
• Permanent Link

About Me

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."--Alexis de Toqueville

Links

• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• My Blog's RSS

Friends

• UndertheSky
• TOSPUBLISHER
• LovingHim4Ever
• ByHisGraceInColorado
• spunkyhomeschool
•
• JillNovak
• MamaBugs
• Kellyque777
• creativehsmom
• schooldaze
• belindaletchford
• LisaQuing
• redmom
• meandmyhouse
• GalacticBlogger
• thehsmomof2
• Titus2woman
• Hutcheson
• Manicmondaymomma
• dswescott
•
• nebraska
• Cre8iveMom
• lifeandtimesofanothermom
• principledlearner
• Raquel
• NewHarvest
• Michaela
• rainbowdash
•
• Honeybee
• Dalaimama
• SingingHisStory
• loughman98
• Lazycreek
• iluvtheland
• JennLovesJesus
• mistresninos
• Janne
• Amber
• leslienoelani
• chickadee
•
•
• lovetolearnmom
• writmm
•
• AmoScribo
•
• TRINITYPREPSCHOOL
• WalkInFaith
• danib
• telmar
•
• dinomomm
• HSmom0f4
•
• Jocelyndixon
• SuperAngel
• RugbyHS
• homeschoolingmommaof4
•
• AussieinAmerica
• home4mariah
• littleskipper
• Keri
• onecrazymom
• domesticangel
Entry 270 of 419
Last Page | Next Page