Matters of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of True Happiness

Nov. 7, 2007 - Sometimes I *hate* the people in my state.

Posted in Political
There is a pervasive culture here that causes people to cling blindly to the status quo. I call it the Culture of Conformity. It is both baffling and disturbing as well as unendingly frustrating. I'm disappointed by the lack of intelligence and foresight that went into the casting of ballot's in yesterday's election and am left thinking that my fellow citizens are woefully ignorant regarding what liberty really is.

I love this quote by former Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson from his wonderful article "The Proper Role of Government":
This means, then, that the proper function of government is limited only to those spheres of activity within which the individual citizen has the right to act. By deriving its just powers from the governed, government becomes primarily a mechanism for defense against bodily harm, theft and involuntary servitude. It cannot claim the power to redistribute the wealth or force reluctant citizens to perform acts of charity against their will. Government is created by man. No man possesses such power to delegate. The creature cannot exceed the creator.

Liberty is not the ability to "reallocate" someone else's private property (and money) for your own personal gains. Also from Benson's article:
Suppose pioneer “A” wants another horse for his wagon, He doesn’t have the money to buy one, but since pioneer “B” has an extra horse, he decides that he is entitled to share in his neighbor’s good fortune, Is he entitled to take his neighbor’s horse? Obviously not! If his neighbor wishes to give it or lend it, that is another question. But so long as pioneer “B” wishes to keep his property, pioneer "A" has no just claim to it.


If “A” has no proper power to take “B’s” property, can he delegate any such power to the sheriff? No. Even if everyone in the community desires that “B” give his extra horse to “A”, they have no right individually or collectively to force him to do it. They cannot delegate a power they themselves do not have. This important principle was clearly understood and explained by John Locke nearly 300 years ago:

    “For nobody can transfer to another more power than he has in himself, and nobody has an absolute arbitrary power over himself, or over any other, to destroy his own life, or take away the life or property of another.” (Two Treatises of Civil Government, II, 135; P.P.N.S. p. 93)
I sincerely, imploringly wish that my fellow citizens would internalize the above principles.

__
"Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils." ~ General John Stark
Post A Comment! :: Send to a Friend!

Nov. 7, 2007 - Vouchers

Posted by mindy
I understand your frustration with this, but I think the vouchers would have only been a topical solution, if you believe what you quoted from ETB. The fact is, vouchers ARE a reallocation of resources, but the resources in question (state budget from taxes) are the real culprit. Those are the first reallocation. So establishing vouchers would, like I said, just be topical, as the real problem lies deeper. Perhaps the failure of the voucher initiative might in time increase dissatisfaction to the point where people would really go at the whole taxes/budget problem. If vouchers had passed, everyone could point to that and say, "See, you can get your money back," and the discussion might end there.

Public schooling paid for by involuntary means is the real issue. What we really need is a free market educational system, but it would take several miracles to even move in that direction. It's very hard to fix something that most people see as working well. Public schooling is far beyond broken, it's condemned and slowly caving in.
Permanent Link

Nov. 7, 2007 - <i>Untitled Comment</i>

Posted by Verity1
<<Public schooling paid for by involuntary means is the real issue. What we really need is a free market educational system, but it would take several miracles to even move in that direction.<<

Well, of course you are right, Mindy. My frustration is that this was something of a step in the right direction. But if people can't accept vouchers, then how could they possibly accept the idea of the government NOT educating the majority of our children?

I would be overjoyed beyond belief to wake up someday in the future in a world where parents retain the responsibility for educating their own children (through private schools, tutors, home, etc.) AND are "allowed" to keep the funds needed to accomplish that. *sigh* Will that day ever come?

Edited by Verity1 on Nov. 7, 2007 at 6:06 PM
Permanent Link

About Me

Here's where I'll post my musings on liberty as well as where I'll share my experiences homeschooling my four children in the classical style.

Blog Links

Home
View my profile
Archives
Friends
My Blog's RSS

Blog Category Links

Curriculum and Book Reviews
Homeschool
Political
Spiritual
General

Other Links

The Well-Trained Mind
Homeschool Reviews
The Well-Trained Mind Forums
Core Knowledge Foundation
George Wythe College

Friends

Today's Modern Mother
The Barefoot Pixie
A R.A.R.E. Education
G.R.A.C.E.
My Laughin' Place
Kings Academy
Mothers Nurture
Mother Ginger
Katie's Words
Entry 13 of 28
Last Page | Next Page