Jun. 13, 2009 - Teaching the Controversy or "I don't know."
One of the best books I have ever read is A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. This hilarious and informative romp through the history of science teaches nothing if not the fact that it takes about three questions of any scientist to get to "I don't know" as the answer. The book, btw, is thoroughly evolutionary in its perspective and a must read for any evolutionist or creationist or intelligent design theorist.
Evolutionists out of Oregon State just noticed something in bird morphology that no one else has ever noticed. And it throws into question the whole "standard consensus" that birds evolved from dinosaurs.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122395783/abstract
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/06/12/birds-did-not-evolve
This is pretty funny. Why does it take a doctoral student to notice something nobody has ever noticed about bird morphology and it's radical difference from dinosaur morphology? Kudos to these two for looking with truly scientific eyes rather than the eyes of standard, accepted scientific theory!
Another thing on this topic that always make me laugh. If you go to the Field Museum, you will see a whole Evolution Hall where you get a 5 billion or so year overview of life and a fairly neat, orderly progression of how folks think that happened. It's presented with a fair degree of certainty.
What makes me crack up every time is just outside that hall you'll see a little display case with some bones from Sue. Why aren't they *ON* Sue, the TRex, downstairs? Well, read the sign and you'll find out that while the scientists are sure the bones belong to Sue, they don't know where they attach or what their purpose was.
To me, this is the ultimate moment of Teaching the Controversy. I always pause dramatically in front of this display case. I point out the humbleness and honesty of whomever put the display together in admitting "I don't know." I think realizing even experts have a lot of "I don't knows" is very liberating for our kids. I then wonder aloud something along the lines of "Gee, if they don't know how these bones fit on to this ONE dinosaur, I wonder how they are so sure they have the whole origin and scope of the development of life right in the fossil hall? Oh, well. Let's go take a look-see."
Blessings,
Holly
0 Comments Post A Comment! Permanent Link
Jan. 1, 2009 - Even ear wax speaks to the glory of God. Yes, really.
http://www.icr.org/article/4312/
From the Institute for Creation Research an article pointing out the intelligent design behind, of all things, ear wax. They entitled this "The Wax that Taxes Darwin."
Short and grossly intriguing.
Blessings, Holly
0 Comments Post A Comment! Permanent Link
Sep. 12, 2008 - Now, I'm no paleoanthropologist...
And I don't have access to the full article at AAAS, but am I the only one who reads the blurb below and thinks, hmm...another sign that perhaps the Neandertals were just a variant of modern humans--possibly a population with wide spread rickets in the post-Flood/Ice Age era where much available sunlight was blocked by volcanic activity? (See Lubenow's Bones of Contention for more on that theory.) If one doesn't buy goo to you evolution lock, stock and barrel would this rate as news worthy or just in the "well, duh" category?
Blessings, Holly
PALEOANTHROPOLOGY:
Brainy Babies and Risky Births for Neandertals
Ann Gibbons
A new study of a rare Neandertal newborn and two infants shows that our closest relatives were born with brains as large as ours and that those brains grew rapidly during the first few years of life.
