Oh Canada!
Jul. 3, 2006 at 10:55 AM
I must admit I read these comments with some amusement. This idea of the "big bad government" seems to be a particularly American bugaboo. We in Canada are quite used to having our governments tax and regulate every aspect of our lives. But it can't be all that bad.....the vast majority of Canadians are madly in love with their country, and international polls show that we are the envy of the world.
You folks need to lighten up a little. God put our governments in place to assist us, not oppress us, and North America has more individual freedom than most continents on this planet. We should be thankful for our governments, not suspicious of them. In fact, the Bible even commands it!
Shnide, you and I have a total difference of opinion here. I am not thankful. Who has the final authority when there is a difference of opinion - the parent or the state? The state will inevitably uses its power to force their way. The proposed California law is one example. You may love your country for the assistance they give you. Not me. I pray for my country. I pray they stay out of my personal life. They have their authority and responsibilities. Raising my children and regulating every aspect of my personal life isn't one of them. We may have more individual freedom than most continents on this planet, but that does that mean I should be willing to give them up. I will not lighten up and give away my my freedom to gain their "assistance". I am not willing to outsource my parenting to the state. Here's an article I wrote last year that explains my thoughts more clearly.
Outsourcing Parenthood
A few months ago a mother came to me all excited. She began to tell my about an experience she had in her daughter's elementary school.
It was around Christmas and her daughter came home from school telling her mom all the wonderful stories her teacher had been reading to her. Sadly, the daughter lamented however, none of the stories were about the real meaning of Christmas. The daughter asked her mother if she could come to her class and read to her a story from their shelf about the birth of Jesus. The mother thoughtfully replied that she would love to but that she would have to check with the teacher. The daughter seemed satisfied. The mother approached the teacher about the matter. The teacher told her that any extra reading material had to be cleared by the principal. The mother appealed to the principal who then consulted with a guideline for reading. After a short wait the mother was granted her request on the grounds that the birth was historical in nature. The mother was thankful.
Not wanting to burst her enthusiasm I told her how glad I was that she was able to read to the children. The mother's excitement puzzled me. Why would a mother seek the authority of someone else to read a book to her child and the classroom? The answer is obvious, of course. The mother was not the authority in the classroom. This is as it should be. The mother is not there every day and the teacher must keep control of the room and the principal must keep control of the school. The mother rightly sought their approval because that is the system that she submitted to when she allowed her daughter to attend.
The question is, why would a mother knowingly yield her authority to someone else to the point where a simple request for a story would require the approval of three others? Simply stated, the mother has outsourced her parenting.
We heard alot about outsourcing jobs in the last election. Everybody was worried about the number of jobs moving overseas. Yet, a bigger problem is brewing right here in the US. We are outsourcing parenthood. Parents are knowingly giving the job of raising their children over to another.
No parent would readily admit this of course. But the increased reliance on day care, before school, and after school programs demonstrates something else. We want the schools to provide nurtritious lunches without ever thinking we should pack the child one ourselves. We want the schools to bus our children to school without ever thinking that we could drive them ourselves. There are companies that will send a day care provider (paid for by the company) to the house when a child is ill so that mom can still go to work. On the weekend, daycares will provide overnight care so that the parents can go out on a date or catch up on house work.
When I was growing up we all went home for lunch. Then in the schools began to take on that responsibility. The parents were thankful. Then the schools began to provide clinics. The parents were thankful. Then the schools began to teach health. The parents were thankful. The schools began to teach sex ed. The parents were thankful. The schools began to parent for them. The parents were thankful.
The educational establishment is no longer bashful about becoming the parent. Consider the bills just introduced in Rhode Island that would "require school districts receiving state aid to include in their plans strategies to decrease obesity and improve health and wellness of students." Since when did obesity become a school issue? When the parents began to outsource parenthood that's when. And just what does "improve health and wellness" mean. It doesn't matter, the parents are thankful. It is one less worry for them.
The schools are not the only arena that parents have outsourced their parenthood. We don't want the inconvenience of monitoring our children's viewing habits so we expect others to rate the shows for us and then we will decide based on their standard. Never mind that their standard is not ours they saved us the time necessary to do it ourselves. We feel good that we have done something and we are thankful.
We rely on internet filters to strain out the filth from our computers. Sure they miss some things that we wouldn't approve of but we're willing to make the trade off for the convenience of not having to monitor ourselves. We can go on with our own business because someone else is "parenting" the children and we are thankful. Don't misunderstand, I am not saying that these things are not helpful. But we have come to rely on others rather than God amd His standard to define parenting and the standards by which we raise our children. As a Christian, I am called to a higher standard. God has given me these children and I take that responsibility seriously. Society may make it easy to oursource parenthood but God will still hold me accountable.
Related Tags: parenting, homeschooling, home education, Canada, California, parenthood, children, smoking









3 Comments and Trackbacks
posted by AcceptanceWithJoy on Jul. 3, 2006 at 4:40 PM
[You folks need to lighten up a little. God put our governments in place to assist us, not oppress us]
I strongly believe the Bible advocates self-government over a large civil government. God established human government (Genesis 9:5,6) immediately after the flood to protect men against each other's sinfulness. Romans 13:3 echoes this thought by stating that those set in authority over us are to be a terror to evil works. There is no Biblical basis for a government doing anything more than protecting individuals from each other. So... why would we be expected to be thankful and supportive of a government that is legislating oppressive laws, establishing social programs that cost us billions of dollars?
posted by SusannahCox on Jul. 3, 2006 at 11:54 PM
I'm with ya 100% on this, Spunky. Great blogging!
As for the paint color you requested, ours was Behr--Mother Nature in Satin Enamel, but the Satin turned out glossier than we expected.
posted by Lazycreek on Jul. 4, 2006 at 4:41 PM
We have been the recipient of Canada's "oppressive social programs," and wouldn't have made it if we hadn't been. We live in an low-population area (like the majority of Canada's geographical surface) where skilled work opportunities are sparse, and farm labour rarely gives a year-round job. For three years, we required the help of Employment Insurance to survive. My husband now has a power engineering position for which he still has to commute an hour in each direction.
Our country is different from yours not just for historical and cultural reasons. We also contend with a far more challenging geography and climate, factors which influence both social policy and our attitude towards it.
And as far as I'm concerned, bring on the anti-smoking laws. I have allergies to it, I hate being forced to inhale other people's cancer choices, and... legal and right are two different things. When the law starts getting abused in the ways you fear, you stand up and knock down whatever you need to. Case in point: Ousting Paul Martin and electing Stephen Harper, who has lowered taxes, supported our troops, and vivisected the long gun registry in just a few months since coming to power.
Canadians differ from Americans in that we won't get into a spitting contest over every little technicality. But we do mark them, and we can only be pushed so far before we push back.
When we do, we do it in a way that ends the argument with as much fairness and decisiveness as possible. That persona is coming to the fore in what even secular journalists are calling "the rise of the West."
Quiet determination, not noisy castigation. It's a cultural difference. By the way, thanks for mentioning Shnide, or I wouldn't have known he was out there. I've subbed to his RSS.
Cat, Lazy Creek Zookeeper