Steve Braun

Aug. 26, 2005 - Fuzzy Math

 

I received an email the other day that contained a common error I see all too often.  The error has to do with the federal tax deduction for home mortgage interest.

 

The reasoning starts out on solid, logical footing like this:

1.  I get a tax break on the interest expense from my home mortgage.

2.  The more I borrow, the greater the amount of interest I will pay.

3.  The greater the amount of interest I pay, the more I will save on my taxes.

So far, so good.  These are all true statements.

 

The problem comes with the goofy conclusions some people make based on these facts.

"I should borrow as much as possible so I can get a bigger tax break."

 

"I shouldn't pay off my mortgage early because if I do, then I will lose out on the tax break."

There is just enough truth in these statements to convince many people to take the wrong action.  What is missing, however, is a simple mathematical reality.

 

The federal tax brackets for 2005 are 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. 

 

That means it is impossible to recoup the full cost of your mortgage interest expense with tax savings.

 

For example, if you are in the 25% tax bracket, then for every $1.00 you spend in deductible mortgage interest, you can save 25 cents on your taxes.  In the 35% bracket you can save 35 cents.  That is the maximum.

 

Therefore, taking on mortgage interest expense just for the sake of the tax deduction is never a winning proposition.

 

Don't see it yet?  Try looking at it this way.  For every $1.00 you give to me, I will return 25 cents to you.  Sound like a deal?  I didn't think so.  That's exactly how the tax break pans out.  Yet more than a few people miss this important point. 

 

Don't let the lure of tax savings lead you into a poor financial decision.

 

Post A Comment!

Oct. 5, 2005 - Great Point

Posted by FamilyBusiness
I never could figure out how people justified buying something to get a tax break. The tax break was never higher than what was spent. Well said!

Steve
Permanent Link

Oct. 17, 2005 - Untitled Comment

Posted by Anonymous
I am struggling with this very idea. If you were buying a home and had the ability to pay for that home with cash, would you? Or would you hold a mortgage to get the tax break. From what you posted here, it sounds as if mortgage free would be the wiser option. Yes?
Permanent Link

Oct. 17, 2005 - Reply to Anonymous

Posted by stevebraun
The answer is yes. You've got it correct. Being mortgage free is the best option IF your only consideration is the tax break versus no tax break. For example, assume that a mortgage will cost you $10,000 in interest per year. In the 25% tax bracket, you would save $2,500 on your federal taxes with the mortgage interest deduction. That means the mortgage costs you a net of $7,500 for the year. That's a losing proposition every time! It does not make sense to spend $10,000 in order to save $2,500 on your taxes.
Permanent Link

Nov. 15, 2006 - options

Posted by spidey
I dont understand how you can make that blanket answer. See your right you didnt learn anything from reading richdad. Hmm I think you read it four times ?
If you had 100k and no other assets would you really pay a house off in cash ? Of course we dont know about the other persons assets but then you didnt ask either. On another note you rightly diss anuities. Good for you. Yet you can take a mortage and pay for annuity and end up with more money in the long run.
Permanent Link

Nov. 15, 2006 - Reply to Spidey

Posted by stevebraun
As I wrote, the point is IF your only consideration is the tax break vs. not having the tax break. It never makes sense to pay spend $10,000 in debt to get a $2,500 break on your taxes.

Also, you assume that if the person invested in annuities (or anything else) that they will come ahead in the long run vs. paying off the mortgage. That's not necessarily true. Investing carries risks and that risk is that you may lose money or earn a subpar return. Paying off a mortgage is a guaranteed return. The real issue is whether a person will beat that return in the market. Maybe so. Maybe not. It all depends on each person's situation.
Permanent Link

<- Last PageNext Page ->
Steve Braun

Steve Braun has been a Christian for 22 years, happily married to his wife Karen (a.k.a. Spunky) for 20 years, and is the proud father of their 6 children who are homeschooled. He is also the founder and president of Liberty Financial Planning. Steve's blog is devoted to writing about the financial services industry, providing commentary on current news items, discussing personal finance concepts or issues, and coaching parents on how to teach their children sound financial stewardship principles.

My Websites

Blog Home Page
Liberty Financial Planning
Liberty Family Resources
Civil War Dads

About This Blog

My Profile
Archives
What This Blog Is About
Objective Financial Advice
Your Privacy
Email Questions/Comments
My RSS Feed

Recent Posts

A Step in the Right Direction
The Best of Blogging
A Better Idea at Ford (Almost)
Evaluate Your Finances
Jonathan Clements on Kiyosaki
More to Life Than Money
Render unto VISA and to God
Personal Finance "How To" List
Market Update 8/31/2006
Regulatory Hell

The Library

Rich Dad Poor Dad Review
Money 101
Bible and Finances
Book Reviews
Budgeting
Children and Finances
Credit Cards
Debt and Borrowing
Economics
Estate Planning
General Finances
Generosity
Investing
Question of the Day
Red Flags and Scams
Retirement
Selecting an Adviser
Taxes
Miscellaneous

Finance

All Financial Matters
Bankrate.com
Christian Credit Counselors
Crown Financial Ministries
Financial Calculators
IRS
Securities & Exchange Comm.
Social Security

Homeschool

Homeschool Talk Radio
Spunky Homeschool
Spunky Jr.


Copyright 2005-2006. All rights reserved. Steve Braun.