After reading what I posted yesterday, it is interesting that on June 9, 2009, WorldNetDaily reported that the White House today slammed the door on a question that had been prepared for the daily news briefing on the fairness of New Hampshire's new law dispensing the designation of "married" to same-sex couples. Sixty-four reporters attended the briefing, but White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Obama Budget Director Peter Orzag only recognized 15 of them, all in the first three rows of the briefing room. Those 15 were allowed to ask 84 questions, including 15 from ABC, eight from Fox, seven from Helen Thomas, six each from CNN and the Wall Street Journal, five each from CBS TV, CBS radio, NBC and NPR, and four each from AP, New York Times and Washington Times. Les Kinsolving, WND's correspondent at the White House and one of the most senior reporters on the White House detail, had been prepared to ask a question related to the president's June 1 proclamation that said, "I call upon the America people to promote equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity"   The question was: "What is the president's reaction to the statement that 'New Hampshire's new same-sex marriage law does not provide equal access to marriage for all because it discriminates against polygamist consenting adults,' from Mark Henkel, national polygamy advocate." My impression is that they just don't want to deal with this because they can see the obvious inconsistency--if it's all right for a man and a man or a woman and a woman to get married (or at least to have civil unions that guarantee them all the rights of marriage), why not a man and two women, or a woman and two men?